WE ARE STILL ALL NAIVE AND NUMB TO MUSLIM DECEPTION

Submitted by TTS (United States), Jan 9, 2008 at 19:03

Dear Mr.Pipes and my fellow non-Muslims,

We have to ask again and again:are we still very naive about Islam and various method and modes of deception? If so,we are surely losing this struggle between Islam and non-Muslims. First,when Diana had fallen in love with a Muslim-guy, we thought it as an ordinary human affair.

When 9/11 attacks happened, it was explained by Westerner Muslim-apologetics as Islam being hijacked by terrorists. When atrocities committed by Muslim seperatists in Southern Thailand under the very eye of army with a Muslim general in high command installed by ignorant Thais in Thailand,we keep quiet. When a large number of illegal Muslim immigrants flooded into Spain,we still view it as an ordinary refugee problem. When Palestinians attacked with rockets against Israel on frequent basis,we view it as desperate act of poor,hopeless,economically disadvantaged people just trying to vent out their anger.

When an American political candidate with Muslim background has tried to achieve higher echelon of America's political scene, we naively supported all along. When someone in academic profession repeated the old mantra of "Islam is a religion of peace",we blindly followed that mantra without making necessary critical study of Islam in every aspect. When a Muslim father killed his own daughters,we kept quiet assuming it as a domestic problem.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.WE HAVE EVERY REASON, EVERY RIGHT AND RESPONSIBILITY TO STUDY ISLAM AND ITS ULTIMATE GOALS, ITS ETERNAL WAR AGAINST NON-MUSLIM INFIDELS AS DECLARED IN THEIR BOOK OF HOLY QUR'AN,THE VARIOUS METHODS AND VARIOUS TOOLS OF GLOBAL JIHAD WAGED BY EVERY ISLAMIST IN THE WORLD BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE !.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".