not quite accurate Arthur

Submitted by Straight_Talk_Luigi (United States), May 26, 2008 at 21:26

1) Polygamous marriages are conducted so that a man can have more than wife. This is done because he really, really wants to have relations with a whole bunch of different types of women with different hair color and skin color.

Just because a man marries someone does not mean he regards her race equally. This is a predicament with Western women who marry Muslim men in many cases. They are seen as inferior and the men literally use their money and wombs to populate the world for jihad. This is the radical Islamic version of "marriage of conveniece."

Also, Judaism is not a race.

Whether it's Muslims or LDS or pagan rituals, if you strip away all the politically correct crap that you seem to revel in, polygamous marriages is a male superiority trick, and Mohammed knew this all to well. It enables a man to have sex with a bunch of different colored women while not being adulterous.

That's the whole deal, Arthur, sexual pleasure without wrath from God.

It's just a nice little loophole in religion, not some ridiculous stance on tolerance and diversity, and the facts about those concepts are ignored completely by Westerners because they are afraid of being called a racist and an Islamophobe.

So, yes, Arthur, facts CAN be dangerous, and if you even pretended to know the first thing about genuine Islam, you would begin to see a pattern that caters overwhelmingly to the Arab and Berber male.

Oh, and, that's not really even my idea. Dr. Pipes, Robert Spencer, and several leading converts FROM Islam to other faiths pretty much hint at the same thing.

Fortunately, many Muslims reject that idea, but make no mistake, the Koran and Hadith say what they say.

2) Regarding Obama, Muslims will take what they can get. You may have heard of Keith Ellison, who represents a district in Minneapolis in the House. Mr. Ellison attended Wayne State University in Detroit and converted to Islam. The reason he was elected was because he was very liberal, as Minneapolis, unlike much of MN, is a liberal city. He wasn't elected because he was a Muslim.

The organization CAIR, which has declared to want sharia law in the USA by converting all to Islam, even gave him money.

Liberal American values and sharia law have nothing in common, yet they still gave. Why?

Publicity. Show the world that Muslims aren't all bad. Interesting strategy, considering that Islam is supposed to be a religion of peace, that it would need such drastic measures to prove it's case.

So the same can be said for Obama. He won't be seen as an apostate, but as an instrument to bring Islam to every American. They just might be shocked when he sends soldiers in the Pakistani Hindu Kush without Mushraff's position.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".