The Roman Conquest

Submitted by M. Tovey (United States), Nov 19, 2008 at 16:42

Really, seriously, are there no references about Titus conquering Jerusalem and destroying the Temple along with the resident rebellious population in the sources you are looking at? If that was the case, then there must be an alternative (though faulty) means by which Jerusalem is called al Quds.

Check some reliable sources and find out that history is viewed by its legacies and the things some people, like unbelieving Jewish people and others of similar points of view, do not want others to know about true Biblical things.

By only recognizing the one incident is further evidence that everyone who does not believe in the accuracy of the Holy Bible are following the corruption of the PEOPLE who do not believe, and they are the ones that will convince themselves it is the Bible that confuses them, and not recognize that true belief is necessary to get at the truth. There were two times, as competent historical sources will show.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".