Prophecy and Promise of Jesus Christ Telling of Roman Destruction of Temple - It Happened to the JEWS.

Submitted by M. Tovey (United States), Nov 21, 2008 at 18:16

Listen. It is quite evident that an attempt to eliminate the 'Jewishness' of the Temple Mount and the Biblical claims that Israel has to the land is necessary to establish the false nationality of the 'Palestinian' complement in the nation of Israel. What is going on there is nothing more than a publicity effort to give a conquered land to a people of a different Biblical lineage, though not in direct relationship to the promise to Abraham. What does not support the previous post's contention is every Biblical reference which contradicts the previous author's assumptions. It is evident why: unbelief in the Holy Bible, and unbelief in who Jesus Christ is, which is understandable under the circumstances.

Manys time we have read in other sources of the modern press that every time an archeological find is made to press the Jewishness of the Temple site, the Waqf are always there to try and dispute it. It the larger scheme of things, we read elsewhere of the much more elaborate efforts to rewrite history, and it is being publish here in the United States. No big surprise, since there is pretty much a consensus that the United States is apparently seeking its own secular path to destruction.

So if it a contention that Muslims will treat the prophetic words of all Prophets the same, and some Mulsim have called Jesus Christ a great prophet, what do we make of Jesus Christ's words to the Jewish believers standing around the Second Temple, built after the return from Babylon (Now in Iraq), and rebuilt by Herod the great just in time for Jesus' appearance. His discourse after the rejection by the Jewish rulers of the time was the pronouncement of the Temple's destruction (Matthew 23-24), which happened less than forty years after Jesus Christ's death, burial, resurrection and ascension. That means many who heard the prophecy saw it fulfilled, and some who recorded it are the witnesses we read of today. There is, of course Josephus Flavius; the Pliny's the elder and younger, amongst the others. What we are faced with here is that historical references that follow the truth are corroborated by the Holy Bible; rather, it is the other way around.

Now we can agree that the land the Romans had control over were heterogeneous, Greeks, Romans, Syro-phoenicians, Sabeans (Arabic) and the like. But let us be plain here, the Jewish people in the city at the time of the Romans were expelled for the second time (third, if one counts the Israeli deportation by the Assyrians) for their rebellion to the Roman occupation (sound familiar?). The rest of history saw other people fill the land until, horror of all horrors to any who want to destroy Israel-like the President of Iran and Hizbollah and Hamas and etc., the Jews were re-established in 1948, just exactly as predicted, prophesied and extolled by the Holy Bible. Then in 1967, the two sticks were re-attached on the way to the full re-establishment of the completed promise to Abraham. Readers, Israel is here and IT IS DONE.

Now, the second appearance of Jesus Christ, as Yeshua HaMashiach, the Holy One of Israel is about to occur as well, and we will see the formation of the future Kingdom of Israel under the authority of Him. But that is for another view to be seen from the Holy Bible, the next installment likely to occur sometime around Hanukkah. Shalom.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".