It's About Who Will Obey The Law - Liberals or Conservatives - What Were They Taught!

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Aug 6, 2018 at 13:55

So, OK; let's look at the record of liberalism (conservatism's opposite side of the same silver dollar) and its effect on the socialistic bent (in spite of the bent others supporting President Trump America is on while providing jobs liberalists cannot seem to do; or promoting the call to the rule of law, like good governance is require by law to do); what remains of the legacy of the 44th Executive as he tried to follow President Clinton's diminishing actions towards submitting America to the new world order; (he was a Rhodes Scholar, wasn't he?).

What they do not tell in the history of America is that its place in history has been contentious from the beginning; that adherents of the rule of law were opposed by the enemies of conservatism: but more devious than that, deeper powers of the darkened sort were there also and have students of the same devious mindset working still in the background, resourcing every evil tool against humanity to destroy humanity itself. Where did that/does that come from now?

The conundrum that is America wields an energy that the socialists' have yet to figure out, let alone defeat. That is their problem with President Trump; he evokes a hatred in the socialist, liberalist, secularist sector of society such that they cannot, not with even most of the psychiatrists being left of center, find a way to eliminate the phenomena that is President Trump, not even using every evil trick in the book. There might be a way, but it will only be available when enough is enough.

This observer also has a public education experience, which by the way was so obvious in its application of introducing the leftist agenda (a major ratcheting down in the fifth grade), that it became obvious everything this citizen needed to know was exposed in the first semester of college' that when exposed, was jettisoned. The Stalinist model of America was inculcated at that time; and except for the Reagan, and now Trump years, has been stream rolling with both republican and democrat interferences towards a Bernie Sanders dream.

But they have all been played, for as was said before, what will be the defining effect of America in history? Only the most erudite and intellectual practitioners of education might get this? All have been played for the arrogant fools that they are and they did it to themselves. And one did not need to attend endless collegiate lectures to absorb this; just a few would have done.

What does liberalism and conservatism, in the rage of hatred, fight over? Money (?); power (?); ........pride (?); if a man thinks he has the wealth, power, the self-will to extend life beyond the known universe, is this not s universal concept that all would have access to? Neither liberalism nor conservatism has that kind of power or resources to effectively rule to any of that affect; they only think that they do: and there lays the deception. It is the deception that man has followed for millennia-in the fallen state of humanity, many have thought they were God; that was proven at the tower of Babel. They were not/could not be Deity.

That persists to this day. Government is nothing more than a God-given means to control and administer the rule of law, for both the lawful and the lawless. Those that govern by the rule of law were conceded to have a power over others; those that rebelled against the rule of law would have no desire to obey the real power behind the law and politically, sought to reign in lawlessness, an antithetically impossible and untenable circumstance. Liberalism has had that day and it is closing. The law will be obeyed eventually; there is nothing liberalism, or even conservatism, can do about it. Who will obey?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".