To Wilner; Non-Muslim historians know where to stop but you don't

Submitted by Nuray (Portugal), Dec 5, 2005 at 10:27

Dear Wilner,

I was expecting a smart explanation for my previous question but not seeing the comparison of our messenger with a psycho maniac? Haven't you realized that you are talking about a messenger of Muslims who are 20% world population? I read biography of Muhammed, peace up on, written by Muslim historians. I didn't see such a disgusting comparison. At least non-Muslim historians know where to stop. If you use this kind of absurd examples to justify your (?) comments nobody will listen to you.

By the way, what kind of books you are reading lately? "psycho maniac" , "raping" etc. It is not good for your soul. Pornographic knowledge don't suit to theological discussions.

Muslims admire their messengers. They like him more than their parents. Non-Muslims have attacked person of Muhammed, peace up on, since he become a messenger of Islam. All they achieved is nothing. All those allegations are very well known by Muslims and required answers are available in many Muslim books. Don't think that you do something original. Not at all. If you want you can keep wasting your time. Worshiping your God is more valuable than attacking person of other messengers. This is my sincere advice 4 you.

Nuray

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".