Question to Nuray

Submitted by John M. (United States), Jan 23, 2006 at 12:29

I read Nuray. she seems embarassed by islamic history and denies all hadiths, and siras which were winessed quoted and collected by hundreds of of diehard muslim witnesses, where as she believes in every word of quran authored by by just one man who claimed talking to angels and claimed visiting Allah on a winged horse without a single witness.

Now, here this Muslim denies the very history of Islam because it shows her prophet in a bad light. Can this Muslim tell us what happened to the real history of Islam and why all these devout followers of Muhammad who were so brainwashed that they were ready to die for him, instead of reporting the true story of him portrayed him, their own prophet, as a thug? This argument is counterintuitive and quite unintelligent. It makes absolutely no sense that all the followers of Muhammad confabulated with each other to fabricate false stories about their prophet making him look like a criminal. We can perfectly understand why believers lie to attribute false miracles to their prophet and make him look holy.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".