A refined test for Turkish IQ

Submitted by Ianus (Poland), Aug 5, 2010 at 09:57

oguztolga ,

You have been accused of plagiarism, spreading lies and gross ignorance. Wouldn't you like to deny the charges by producing more evidence in their support ?

Anyway, let us move your quiz from the Turkish primary school level to a European secondary school level by refining it a litle. It will be more difficult as some questions can have more than one answer.

" 1.Who tried to make a coup d'etat against the legal President Makarios in 1974?

a)Cylons
b)Disney World
c)Greek Junta+Nicos Sampson the ripper "

1.1 Did the Turks intervene to restore the legal overthrown president Makarios ?

a/ Yes, they did and when Makarios returned whoel and healthy they cheered and left Cyprus for ever rushing back to Ataturkistan.

b/ No, they didn't. They were happy to have a decorous pretext provided by their US godfather Kissinger to organise another bloody robbery of land and resources .

c/ The coup d'etat had nothing to do with the Turkish invasion as the Turks in Cyprus didn't recognise the Makarios government after establishing their separate administration , i.e. in fact a state in state , in 1968. In March 1974 , shortly before the invasion the Cypriot Turks issued their own stamps and introduced Turkish lira instead of Cyprus pound as their currency.

"2.Who were the Gaurantor countries of the Cyprus
independent state which was fromed with London/Zurich agreements in 1960?

a)Dart wader,Mickey Mouse,Donald Duck
b)Aborgines,eskimos and Afganistan
c)Turkey,UK,Greece "

2.1 Where in the Zurich-London Agreements was any guarantor country given the right of military invasion and occupation of independent, neutral , non-aligned Cyprus?

a/ In the Quranic ayat which explicitly refers to the Zurich-London Agreements (115.01)

b/In the best selling book in Turkey, called "Kavgam" or "Mein Kampf" by A. Hitler (vol.ii, p. 324 in the Turkish translation)

c/ Nowhere

2.2 Did Turkey have any valid claims to have a say in Cyprus ?

a/ No, beacuse it had renounced all claims to the island in the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923.

b/Yes, because it respects no treaties and no law and is barbarian.

c/ Yes, because Allah is Turkish by nationality and citizenship .

"3.Why Turkish army went to Cyprus to intervent in 1974?

a)Summers are beautiful in Cyprus
b)Turks were very happy to be killed by the Greek cypriots
c)To save Turks as a guarantor country"

3.1 Why did the Turkish Army invade Cypus?

a/ To Islamize Cyprus, to build new mosques and Quranic schools there, to destroy all churches and non-Moslem monuments and expel and exterminate as many kafirs as possible

b/ To grab as much land as possible

c/ To give the Yuruk nomads of Central Anatolia a chance to change fertile arable Greek farms in Northern Cyrpus into deserts and steppes for their herds

3.2 How do Turks save Turks ?

a/ By indiscriminately terrorizing , converting forcibly to Islam or killing anybody who is non a Turk and additionally those that might doubt Turkish innocence and complain .

b/ By bombing hospitals, killing members of UN peace-keeping force and blaming all except themselves .

c/ By watching the movie "Iraq- The Valley of the Wolves" after the mosque prayers on Friday to learn new facts about human rights violations in the Moslem world by Americans and Jews.

"4.Did Turkey warned Greek junta and UK Government before the intervention?

a)No they have warned Kolonaki bars to stop drinking
b)No Turks warned the girls in Aia Nappa larnaca
c)yes but both countries slept on their ears"

4.1 How do usual Turkish lies look like ?

a/ The Turks say there was no Armenian genocide or Byzantine empire.

b/ To prove Turks can never commit a crime or lie they threaten to kill and jail anybody who disagrees.

c/ The Turks say Kurds are happy to be Turks.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".