Mistake not to focus on how Obama has embraced the Muslim Brotherhood

Submitted by Wallace Edward Brand (United States), Oct 23, 2012 at 11:47

In the third debate, Romney said that an important part of his strategy was to help the non-radical Muslims looking for freedom and democracy after the Arab Spring. In contrast, Obama has embraced the Muslim Brotherhood,, the radical Muslims, even though there is substantial evidence that they have been engaged in a 25 year conspiracy to subvert the US from within and replace Constitutional law with Sharia. This is based on documentary evidence disclosed in the Holy Land Foundation case, and more evidence discovered by Swiss Authorities of a 100 year plan for world domination of sharia.

Romney could have and should have nailed his point home by referring to Obama's direction to Mubarak to have the Muslim Brotherhood representatives present at his talk in Cairo even though they had been outlawed by Egypt and by his purging government files of references to Islamic radicalism, firing two DOD instructors on Islamic Radicalism, the DOD referring to the Hasan murders at Fort Hood as "workplace violence" even though the perpetrator commenced his attack by yelling Allahu Akbar, and we find that many Islamic radicals have visited the White House over the last four years.

Obama continues to claim the Muslim Brotherhood is no longer radical when the head of the Muslim Brotherhood just called for slaughter of all Jews.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".