Strength and arsenals

Submitted by David W. Lincoln (Canada), Feb 15, 2008 at 22:46

Ianus, I guess the first question is, does the U.S. maintain an arsenal of nuclear tipped missiles? Frankly, I don't think it is necessary. Here is why: the satellite that went haywire is going to be shot down by a missile. This is a very good demonstration of what can be used as a missile shield. As for the original intent of my first post, the introduction of what is objectively true is the entrance of something that is quite strong. Ergo, the use of the term "nuclear".

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".