Amitabh Tripathi, petrol is not an issue

Submitted by Infidel (Canada), Feb 22, 2008 at 00:27

If you don't agree that some nations are the only reason for Muslim appeasement because of their need for petrol, then please explain why Canada, USA and Britain do not refer to killers in their country as Muslims, even though we know they are Muslims. Several years ago, Britain suffered the killing of over 50 Brits by Muslims yet refused to refer to them as Muslims. Why did the USA not refer to the killers as Muslims, 16 from Saudi Arabia and 3 from Egypt, as the destroyers of the Twin Towers and 3000 people? Why did George Bush invite a number of Muslims into the White House to tell them that the USA did not hold the killers as Muslims, even though everyone knew they were?

Why did George Bush tell the Saudi's that the USA did not hold them responsible even though 16 of the killers came for Saudi Arabia? And why did Muslims from all over the world celebrate the destruction of the Twin Towers and 3000 people? Why did CAIR (a Muslim Society in the USA) celebrate on September 11, 2001? The Muslims celebrated because Islam made a statement that the world belongs to them and Canada, Britain and the USA made nice because they need the OIL.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".