And the saga continues: islam was really spread by the sword and this what the Qur'an really says

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Apr 3, 2009 at 07:39

Our dear shaji rabina yu3alimuhu ina alislam deen al-3rab faqat

>If Mushrik had the option to either convert to Islam or killed by sword,

And that is my point so woould you agree that at least in the case of Meccan pagans islam was spread by the sword as "islam taslam" or convert to islam or be safe! Right? then your claim is bogus and would you like to retract your bogus claim that Islam was never spread by the sword?

But here is your bonus question for today: why would your Allah ask Abul Qasim and his minions to kill in his name in-order to spread islam? could it be because Allah is not able to change the minds of those pagans? You know what this means? it means that your Allah is not omnipotent! Or could it be that your Allah wanted war so Muslims can collect the ghanima and he can get 1/5 of the loot colletced as per Q8:41 so which one is it?

> why huge number of people of other faiths still living in Muslim part of the world….??.

And what does this have to do with the fact that I'm syaing that your claim that islam was not spread by the sword is a bogus claim as it was spread by the sword at least in the case of the pagans of mecca? so what is your answer ya ayuha al-falyasoof al-kabeer!

>Muslims were the lords of Arabia for 1400 years.

Oh your masters the Arabs! I rest my case

>For a few years the British ruled, and for a few years the French ruled. Overall, the Muslims ruled Arabia for 1400 years. Yet today, there are over 22 million Arabs who are Coptic Christians.

Really? there are 22M Copts? where did you get your numbers from? and thank the Gods that there are indeed many people in the Middle East that never wanted to be victims of islam like you and always believed that abul qasim was no more than an Arabian warlord and caravan raider

>Also, if Islam spread by sword, why there was no widespread killing at the time of Makkah victory, which became the turning point of the influx of people to Islam in early Islamic period…..??.

islamic delusuions again. you told us that islam never spread by the sword and you quoted another ignorant writer right? But I told you that you are wrong because at least in the case of the Meccan pagans islam was spread by the sword so what does this have to do with the influx of many victims of islam to islam? Do you think that it may be a case of the Stockhom Syndrome when the victim becomes the proponent of the evil like you? Do you think for a minute that your Hindu ancestors knew what they got themselves into when they converted to islam? they converted to a religion whose so holy book was written in a language that they cannot read speak or understand! How pathetic

> Open your eyes and realize who is ignorant……!!!!.

The ignorant is you

> I would certainly go to the extent of calling you a "liar",

Anyone who tells me that islam was not spread by violence at least in the case of Meccan pagans is either a liar or he is ignorant of what the Muslim sources tell us so which one is it our dear sahji the tablighee?

> as you did with me but I you are advised to learn about Islam.

And I urge to to abandon islam and be free again and stop your delusions about your masters the Arabs beucase they have no regard for people like you and to them you are no more than a maskeen min el-hind

For Dr. Pipes I hope you do not delete "maskeen min el-hind" as this is what the Arabs call both Muslims and Hindus that work in the Gulf and in saudi Arabia

>You find time to insult me.

Oh the Muslim ego has no limits and if you want to be sanctimonious then you will be ridiculed do you get it?

> I don't know who you are your whereabouts.

Will Berkina Fasso do?

> I can only recommend you to go through Qur'an in the language you know best at least once and try how that is catching you.

I can read the Qur'an in Arabic something that you cannot do. You? you can read it in an urdu translation right? how pathetic

>If you are a truth-seeker with good intentions, just explore through Qur'an without a prejudiced mind.

Oh and read the kill the this and slay the that and fight the those! No the Qur'an is a violent book

>Allah didn't make you infidel.

Really? But your Allah says and i'm paraphrasing that he guides whom ever he wants and your masters the Arabs tell us that the Qur'an says that this life is all about al-qada' wa al-qadr (oh I do not translate Arabic for wannabe arabs like you) and do you know what this means? it means that if anyone is to be blamed for us being infidles then it must be Allah so the question now is how can we get in touch with Allah? Do you have his e-mail address? I will do the talking after all the poor guy only speaks Arabic

And here is your bonus for today: the Qur'an says in Q14:4 that islam is the religion of the Hijazi Arabs only so who was the prophet (from among the 120,000 prophets that were sent by your Allah) that was sent to your Hindu ancestors? Let me guess he ain't Muhammad

>HE has given you the freedom to select right from wrong.

Really? then how about al-qada' wa al-qadr? and how come you did not know that? could it be because you are ignorant about such doctrine? or could it be that you know about it but you hoped that we infidels do not know but in this case you would be and you must padron me a liar? so which one is it?

>Nobody is Muslim because he born in Muslim family and follow principles against Islam. When the person willfully chooses this ideology and submits his will to ONE and ONLY GOD, then only he becomes Muslim. So the CHOICE is yours……

reallY? so all babies are not born Muslim as we are told by your masters the Arabs? How come you did not know that? could it because you are ignorant or a liar? so which one is it?

Shame on you

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".