One more victim of the Sydney atrocity! Free speech on twitter!

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Dec 25, 2014 at 12:47

Hi MW

I want to bring to your attention that those in charge of twitter suspended the twitter account of the cleverest satarist in twitter Jospeh al-Qaeda or @jihadistjoe. He makes fun of Islam, the prophet of islam and the books of Islam and he is 100% accurate and he had about 24000 followers on twitter which is very good and even Richard Dawkins like him

https://twitter.com/richarddawkins/status/485330386529296384

And here are some of his brilliant tweets

http://favstar.fm/users/jihadistjoe

Then he posted tweets in response to the silly and bogus hashtag #IWILLRIDEWITHYOU and he was making very good points as in Muslims do not seem to worry about the victims and all they care about is the bogus Islamophobia and he wrote "I will not ride with you" And the sad thing is this was too much for the many self righteous and delusional citizens in Australia and their little feel good topos of #IWILLRIDEWITHYOU and the end result is his twitter account was suspended because of complaints submitted to twitter and my guess is the source of the complaining were members of the clueless left in Australia

http://sputniknews.com/analysis/20141216/1015896184.html

And yes there is a hashtag on twitter #BRINGBACKJIHADISTJOE so stay tuned

This is the danger of a literary topos because it becomes what German historians call Heilsgeschichte or salvation history and this is why this little bogus #IWILLRIDEWITHYOU should be exposed as a big time dangerous lie

Twitter now is censoring free speech and the land of the free aka the US is not the land of the free anymore

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".