You win, Harrak

Submitted by Pat (United States), Mar 17, 2006 at 17:18

Okay Harrak, I give up. You betray the weakness of your arguments when you choose a new subject and launch into a new diatribe instead of defending your position. I ask direct questions and you can't or won't answer them. I never said you were anti-American. I never even implied it. Twice I've asked you point-blank questions and never once questioned your personal feelings toward me or anyone else. In each case you've ignored or sidestepped them.

You're right about one thing. It's a free forum, thanks to Dr. Pipes.

You said we were wrong to respond as we did in Iraq. So I put it bluntly. How DO we respond? You can't or won't answer. I understand if you don't know, because I certainly don't, but you don't even acknowledge the question. Instead you pick a new topic.
What do the presidents of Chile or Bolivia have to do with the issue of SJS?

I have a lot of answers to the questions you ask, but why should I waste my tme responding to anything you say when you refuse to engage in discussion? It's obvious you're not interested. That's why my last message was to the point. Again, you just ignored it and went on to something else. It had nothing to do with you and everything to do with how Muslim countries treat their own citizens.

I thought you would have more information on that subject than I did. Was I wrong? (I don't expect an answer on this question, either.)

I'll read your postings and enjoy every one of them. As I said, you make me laugh (or at least smile). I'm sorry if that offends you.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".