RE:Harrak and the Great Satan

Submitted by WeAreAllDanes! (United States), Mar 26, 2006 at 20:01

"taking other`s religion and modifying its scripture in a corrupt and stupidly provocative way makes it legitimate for the followers of that faith to name you The Great Satan. I think that is a legitimate nomination. I disagree with death sentences NO NO NO. I only support calling you The Great Satan."

Interestingly enough, that's pretty much what Mohammad did....

"Now, is Satan bad! that is a whole big philosophical issue. Let us agree that attacking other faiths by an alien element makes that element legitimate to be called Great Satan."

Kind of like the Koran? With all its attacks on other faiths? So, I guess that means we can call the Ummah the "Great Satan", then. Right?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".