Cherry picking time and our dear Dawud

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Nov 26, 2009 at 13:12

Our dear dawud keeps coming back for more! Go figure

>You claim to have "reverted" back to arab paganism

Yes I did and talk is cheap

>and then you claim there is no Allah, but the pagans of pre islamic arabia believed in Allah so you need to make your mind up.

RTOFL well let me see

1. I'm sure you have heard from other tablighees that Christians in the Middle East call their God, Jesus that is, Allah right mr fake? Well let me see the Allah of the Christians cannot the Allah of the Muslims unless your Allah is really Jesus. So is your Allah jesus?

2. Allah is one of our gods and he is a pagan god too?. So is your Allah a pagan god too?

3. Therefore I must conclude that Allah of the Christian Arabs and meccan pagans cannot be your Allah unless your Allah is either Jesus or he is a pagan god what do you think our dear dawud the lost tablighee?

>I find it very strange that you wish to argue with me about english grammer. Its not like I copy and paste my posts into word in order to do a spell check to ensure the spelling is perfect considering where Im posting. Your very immature and childish and have no desire to discuss the truth or make any rational arguements to support your views.

Oh here is your bonus for today and this is aya 79:30 and you will have 3 mistakes in one aya and what a fadiha

wa al-arda ba3da dhalika dahaaha

1. Mistake in spelling: your Allah spells the word

DHHA

What a fadiha (scandal) let me fix Allah's spelling by adding a fatha above the hah and an alif after the hah and a fatha above the heh et voila

DaHaaHaA

So much for the unedited Qur'an

2, Mistake is syntax/grammar

this aya as per Muqatil should be read as

wa al-arda MA3A dhalika dahaaha

After all it must be

and the earth with and not after

Unless Allah had no clue about the chronology of his own creation

For the readers this aya was a puzzle to the early Ulama as in the words of Wansbrough

"...it involved a dogmatic postulate relevant to the chronology of divine revelation and was recognized as one of the standard puzzles (read this as mistakes) of scripture substitution of "together" for "after" (or the earth after that he spread it out (read this as made it flat) it should have been the earth with that he made it flat) was thus in the precise sense of the term exegetical"

So much for Allah's poor grammar and syntax

What a scandal

3. Mistake in science: Your Allah is saying that he made the earth flat! So is the earth flat?

What a fadiha

So you see our dear Dawud if your Allah makes mistakes not just in garmmar but in syntax and spelling and science then I must be in good company

>This is the last time I respond to any of your immature pathetic posts INSHA'ALLAH!!!

Oh so it is insha'allah and not your bogus inshallah right? You know what we call in the west those that do not give credit to their sources? we call them plagiarists. Oh you can look this one up in a dictionary

I urge you to abandon islam and be free again

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".