Our dear Hassan aka Pierre al-tablighee and his bogus command of history revisited

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Apr 19, 2007 at 07:58

Your command of Muslim theology is flawed, and the context thing is a bogus excuse ...

Now here is your lesson in the defective Muslim theology:

1. The last revealed Sura is Surat al-Tauba or Chapter 9. Right?

2. Based on the doctrine of al-nasikh wa al-mansukh (abrogation) or any later Quranic dispensation will abrogate an earlier dispensation in the same subject matter. More later.

3. Now enter Ayat al-Sayf (do you know what is ayat al-sayf? I doubt it, but it is Q9:4 or the infamous iQtoloo al-mushrikeen) and based on al-nasikh wa al-mansukh this aya will abrogate the likes of "la Ikrah fi al-deen"

4. Now according to Malik, which you ain't, in his Kitab al-Jihad holy war or jihad aka harb muqadassa is based on Q2;216 "kutiba 3alaikum al-qital" we have the foundation for holy war.

5. Now in Q9:29 your Allah declares _uncondtional war_ on ahl al-kitab which was interpreted by the Muslim 3Ulama as the Jews and Christians, and now the likes of our dear Ms Armstrong the wannabe historian, she also includes the Hindus and Buddhists, and based on al-nasikh wa al-mansukh it means that you, as a Muslim, must fight ahl al-kitab with no conditions, and your goal is as per 9:29 is that islam becomes the supreme religion, and ahl al-kitab pay the mafia tax known as the jizya.

6. Now the real question is, who are those mushrikeen in Q9:4? We are told that they were the pagans of Mecca but if you read very early exegesis of this aya by the likes of Ibn Qatada, he believes that the mushrikeen in Q9:4 are really the Jews and Christians, and for this we have to turn to Q9:30, where your Allah claims that Jews regard 3Uzair as the son of God (sic), and the Christians regard Jesus as the son of God, therefore they are mushrikeen and it makes sense. Did you get it?

7. Now let us turn back to the word iqtoloo or kill (plural) in Q9:4 it can also be read as: qatiloo or fight which very much fits with Q9:29 now do you get it?

Your Allah declared an unconditional war on the rest of humanity, period. How come you did not know that?... And do us all a favor: do not use the context excuse because it does not work in this forum

As for your bogus understanding of history, the Hijaz was a non historical entity of the Middle East in the late antique period and the Middle East. I'm talking about in the &th century is Egypt, Syria, Palestine, Mesopotamia and Iran, and not the Hijaz. If you do not get this I will consider you to be beyond help, so are you beyond help?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".