"dhimmi no more" I can take no longer your nonsense and being illogical

Submitted by Hassan Pierre Arceno (Philippines), Apr 22, 2007 at 04:39

"dhimmi no more" ...said: "...share with us why shame on me? I'm not the one who is pretending to be an ex-Catholic and then behave like a typical tablighee, which you are."

Your every post is always full of nonsense arguments, but it is not a surprise for a man who have no logic and poor in education! See, you speak nonsense again by denying my self testimony that I am a Roman Catholic converted to Islam! You even cannot tell what is ny nationality even by looking at my family name ie, Arceno....my christian name is Pierre Carpe Arceno for your information! My name will tell you the obvious and it does not sound pakistani. But as an illogical you denied the obvious even if you have no evidence to deny my testimony! And then you accuse me of being a pakistani tabligh even if you have no basis! Your attitude is indeed a classic style of an illogical ! Shame on you!

For your information, the group of so called muslims whom i do not like after the Taliban and al-qaeada is the tabligh, all of which are groups of muslims who interpreted Islam and the Holy Qur'an and the hadiths/history narrowly and without using any critical mind or logic. that is why they have a kind of "Islam" which is far from the original or true Islam of prophet Muhammad! Like you, most of the tablighs are illogical being influenced by wahabism - perhaps you used to debate with them, that is why you are now badly became more illogical than them!

You are already an illogical man, then you are now in the worst state and i am afraid that perhaps I too will become illogical by giving time debating with you who is no doubt an illogical person! If ever i stop answering your posts then it means i am fed up and can no longer take wasting my time arguing an illogical opponent!

You also said: "You know that I'm very right, the Qur'an says islam is the religion of the arabs and you ain't one. Period Shame on you for debating the obvious,,,You know no Arabic but this does not seem to stop you from debating a language that you do not know. I call this chutzpah."

Who said so that you are very right? The fact that you do not know that followers of Islam are not only Arabs but Americans, French, Spanish, Malays, Filipino, Turkish, Africans, Russians, Chisese etc is more than enought to say that you are indeed an illogical idiot who still belive otherwise and maintain that Islam is only for the Arabs! And besides, you even accused me of being not a master in Arabic and by that if you used your brain you can realize that it is even enough as a proof that knowing Arabic is not a requirement to become Muslim!!! Shame on you!!

You also said: "Your command of reading history is poor. And like I say: you are here defending the religion and the imperialsim of the arabs that brutalized your ancestors, and for this I say shame!"

And who told you that you are very much knoledgeable in history? An illogical and idiot man can never be knowledgeable in history! And because you claim that you are rich in knowledge of History then you are indeed an illogical !

In my previous post I always emphasized that the role of the eastern christians are just translators and that eastern christians like Hunain ibn Ishaq have no any scientific treatise or works being translated by the then awakened europeans!! What he have as you also mentioned is only his work as a translator! That is, his translation of the ancient greek works into syriac and arabic!!! And i wonder why you do not realized that your arguments will not refute but support my manin argument that eastern christians were mere translators that time not scholars of mathematics, medicicne, chemistry, astrology, etc.

What can i say then in your bogus intelect?I will say: SHAME ON YOU!

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".