Will Europe Resist Islamisation

Submitted by Thiagan (India), Apr 3, 2008 at 02:17

Now the problem is identified and clearly acknowledged as a problem, let us think of possible solutions.

The first solution is the most desirable. A reformer appears in the Islamic horizon and implements a reform movement that will envelop the Islamic world and put the community on the track of development from its past track of violence. Past experience rules out such a possibility, the appearance of pacifist mahadi. The world can not also indefinitely wait for such an appearance and a satisfactory conclusion.

The second alternative is what some Europeans are talking about. They can be most cruel and violent, if pushed to the corner. Europeans killed sixty lacs Jews in forties in the gas chambers without battling an eyelid etc. Who are the next targets for the gas chambers needs no second guess. This is a messy and patently unacceptable option.

The third option is to create conditions in which the followers of Islam will have no alternative except to integrate or to move to one of their own countries. The following steps may facilitate such a desirable change:

> Non Islamic religions like Christianity, Hinduism etc. can join together and demand reciprocity in religious matters from the muslim world. In muslim countries, muslims can not convert to other religions but other religionists can convert to Islam. Such discriminatory practices should end and other countries can retaliate by legally banning conversions to Islam. Hindu leaders have already called upon the Christian church to start a non Islamic inter religious dialogue to unitedly confront Islamic threat.

> Non muslim countries should not surrender to the violent and ugly demonstrations of muslims in matters like burqua, Taslima, Rushdi etc and should steadfastly maintain freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is indivisible and an honest scrutiny of all religious matters should be deemed as non negotiable and this includes a close scrutiny of the Book, the life and the conduct of the founder and its followers and this should not be abandoned on the plea of religious dignity. Individuals have rights and dignity; belief systems do not have.

> A real dissertation of the Book, the life and conduct of the founder and the history of the followers will reveal that Islam is an undesirable component in any civilized society. It should be exposed.

> If a muslim wants to leave his religion, he should be permitted to do so and any threat to his life should be confronted by the state without mercy.

> We should focus our indignation on muslims committing acts of violence and not on non muslims writing on those incidents. The political correctness should go.

> Make it clear that local laws / constitution will not be replaced by shariaa. Enforce punishment for violations like child marriages, temporary marriages, intermediate marriages etc

> Teach the muslims the imperative of coexisting peacefully with others on an indefinite basis

> Begin comprehensive programme in mosques and madarassas all over the world to teach against ideas of violent jihad and Islamic supermascism

> Expose and throw out the socialist and secular fanatics of the polity; they are the willing accomplices for destroying the non muslim majorities

> Reintroduce death penalty and make extradition easy.

> Till Islam responds to the call of other religionists for religious freedom and parity in muslim countries, the following can be implemented.

Prohibition of Muslim immigration
New legislation banning halal butchery
Prohibition of new mosque construction
Drastic restrictions on Muslim access to welfare benefits
Punitive taxation on Muslims to fund security services
Closures of existing mosques
Closures of Muslim schools
Banning the hijab/niqab/burka
Criminalization of verbal support for Muslim terrorists
Prohibition of public gatherings of Muslims on security grounds
Prohibition of Muslim-Muslim marriage

The above measures may appear to be harsh and undemocratic. But they are essential to save the world from the possibility of Islamic domination and the enemies of intolerance cannot be tolerant, or neutral, without inviting their own suicide. And the advocates and apologists of bigotry and censorship and suicide-assassination cannot be permitted to take shelter any longer under the umbrella of a pluralism that they openly seek to destroy.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".