Islamic Self Delusion of Grandeur has No End

Submitted by Singha (India), Apr 14, 2008 at 01:10

Gist of your argument is West is bad, Jews are bad, christians are bad, the Hindus are bad. But the real cause koran, mohummad and hadis need to be hidden/absolved of their bloody history. When faced with hard reality and facts about the evil nature of islam, muslims refuse to acknowledge the truth, preferring to call the facts falsehood. So September 11 attack was carried out by Jews not muslims! Historian indeed! you should substitute the word historian with charlatan.

Direct Action plan, and jinnah's call for muslim league violence, when the muslim goons went around and triggered violence is well known. The peadings of best known apostle of non-violence last century, Mahatma Gandhi fell on deaf muslim ears. Your view has been that non muslims should not respond to muslim violence. Take a walk. We now know enough about islam. It is going to be two eyes for an eye. Bush rightly took out two countries for two towers. Muslims will think 10000 times now before attacking America.

Lies that muslims have written about Hinduism is enough to fill the Pacific ocean. Castes is nothing but tribes in another paradigm. It is deliberate malice to mix up religion with caste/tribal heirarchy. We know what happens in islamic pakistan, when a muhajir man loves a pathan girl or a lower status (tribe/caste) man tries having relationship with a higher caste girl, though both follow the islamic faith. If caste were absent among Indian muslims one can still accept your assertion. It is not. Ashraf/Ansari divide, jat/gujjar divide tribal divisions among muslims lay bare the assertion that caste/tribe is present only among Hindu Indians. Tribalism/castism is indeed a social issue in Indian subcontinent. I dont think when it comes to Islam, you will blame the religion despite the fact that a Pathan does not like to give his daughter in wedding to a muhajir.

It is koran which explicitly says that the status of woman is inferior - evidence of two woman muslims is equal to that of one muslim man. And Islam sanctifies slavery even today.

Among your orwellian lies, this one takes the cake. It is the islamic world that gained - from Indian medicine and science. Muslims stole the idea of zero from Indian Hindus are project it as it was there own invention. Islam as you would be aware prohibits music. Whatever music that is present in muslim world is inspite of islam and because of its ancient non islamic traditions.

Naushad Ali, the music composer when presented with the options of chosing his family (islam) and music, chose music. His islamic family was very angry with Naushad's interest in music. Mohummad Rafi, the singer, despite being of Punjabi origin chose India and not pakistan. Sahir Ludhianvi, Hazrat Jaipuri, Shakeel Badayuni and so many preferred Hindu majority India rather than islam majority pakistan. Because Hindu environment, traditions and canvass is liberal and fosters fine arts. India is secular because it has Hindu majority. Hindus as in Gujarat will not perpetually keep quiet to islamic violence.

The very fact that you dont seem to know these terror merchants nails lie to the claim of your being historian. Professor Durant is an authority. Not a lying historian apologist or someone that indulges in polemics as you have alluded.

Sheikh Ahmed Sirhindi naqshbandi sufi muslim fanatic. His letters to Akbar will tell you what kind of person he was. Despite his righteous claim to throne as the first prince, Dara shukoh was murdered by muslims for taking interest in Hinduism. Muslims preferred backing true muslim, islamic aurangzeb to the mughal throne. On Moinuddin Chisti and Nizamuddi Aulia you may like to read Sitaram Goel. For God's sake dont lie that you are a Historian.

Please dont think that empty islamic assertions and falsifications will go uncontested in Internet age.

Remember that the problem fundamentally is with islam, not people. If you are serious about peace with non muslims, first edit koran and accept that mo-hum-mad is not a peaceful personality like Buddha or Jesus and does not merit comparison with them.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".