Mansoor: What's wrong with pee? Your prophet advised camel pee for good health!

Submitted by Plato (India), May 2, 2008 at 06:37

>>…Can you justify pee drinking of Gandhi? can you justify bathing in Ganga where you see half burned dead bodies floating and creating health hazards?<<

Can you justify your prophet's recommendation of drinking camel urine? (Bukhari Volume 1, Book 4, Number 234:

Narrated Abu Qilaba:

Anas said, "Some people of 'Ukl or 'Uraina tribe came to Medina and its climate did not suit them. So the Prophet ordered them to go to the herd of (Milch) camels and to drink their milk and urine (as a medicine).

Anyway your maulana historians are misinformed. In your eagerness to pee on Indians you chose the wrong leader. Gandhi did not drink his own urine. Morarji Desai did. And you know what, Morarji became prime minister of the country and lived a healthy life into his eighties. Maybe he knew something you don't? If camel urine can make you healthy why not your own?

You think pee is unhygienic? It is extracted from your blood by the kidneys. The pee is extracted from your blood, how can it be hygienic? Try this experiment. If you have a cut anywhere on your body apply a little of your pee on it (remember your blood is carrying it) and it will heal in double quick time. Even diabetics wounds sometimes do. I have seen it happen.

Just as zam zam water purifies you so does Ganges water. A few floating bodies cannot detract from the holiness bestowed on the Ganges by the millions of Hindu gods and goddesses. Zam zam has been blessed by only one god.

>>. Proud Indian...mind you...the Cast System and discrimination of Humans into Brahaman, Acchoot and Dallits is a living fact attributed to your religion of the stone ages.<<

Discrimination of humans into superior males and inferior females subservient to males is a living fact of Islam. Islam has also discriminated against humans who are slaves. They can be sold or kept as concubines against their will. Islam discriminates against unbelievers calling them najees, deaf and dumb.

>>is system is strictly followed by the educated Hindus specially in India where Dallits are not allowed to even sit with Brahamans. Brahamans throw away their dishes once a Dillits or Achhot touches them. Brahamans even burn their clothes if any Dallit or Achhoot touches them. Correct me If I am wrong.<<

Let me correct you. Your maulanas have been lying to you. Have you heard of Mayavati? She is an achoot and she is the chief minister of the largest state of India and voted in by all including Brahmins and Muslims. Brahmins bow down to her in respect. Have you heard of Karunanidhi. He is the chief minister of one of the largest south Indian states in India and he is a low caste. Mansoor you are living in cloud cuckoo land where India is concerned.

>>I know you would burry your head like an Ostrich. The link below is clear evidence of highly dangerous belief when Human rights and individual respect are considered.<<

Have you thought of acting like an ostrich when you read in the Koran that you can keep slaves and use them as concubines? Or have you thought about the individual rights of women when the Koran says that you can thrash them for what you consider is misbehaviour on their part. Leave aside human rights what about the right to life? Your Allah allows women accused of lewdness to be shut away until they die.

>>Hindus don't have any right to discuss Islam because the moment they start discussion it will be hard for them to hide their face from crimes attributed to Hindu religion, the Satti, the shaving of head of widows, turning widow to only white dress and not even allowing them to wear a sandal or shoe..<<

Islamic crimes against women are as numerous and more cruel than anything the Hindus have devised. You can keep female slaves as concubines. Muslims indulge in female genital mutilation. You keep all your women, whether widows or not, in black dress allowing only the eyes to be seen.

>>The horrifying religion you are following has already turned life into hell for many women in India.<<

You stone women to death both for consensual sex and also for being raped. Anas bin Malik said, "The position with us about a woman who is found to be pregnant and has no husband and she says, ‘I was forced,' or she says, ‘I was married,' is that it is not accepted from her and the hadd is inflicted on her unless she has clear evidence of what she claims about the marriage or being forced or if she comes bleeding if she was a virgin….." "If she does not produce any of those, the hadd is inflicted on her and whatever such claims she makes are not accepted from her." A clear case of the woman being guilty unless proven innocent.

>>The trick of highlighting only minority of so called modernized Indians cannot change the reality.<<

At least the Hindus have a minority who are trying to change things. Can you say the same about Islam? Any Muslim who dares to raise questions about Islamic practices will be slain with the consent of the majority of Muslims.

Regards

Plato

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".