If you are not advocating violence what are you ...?

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Apr 9, 2008 at 17:21

Narenda Modi was responsible for the death of over 700 Muslims. How is he ever a politician of freeworld. Gujarat is an area with a rise of Hindu extremism and not actually a Muslim one.

The United States revoked a visa for Modi the following year, on the grounds that he was responsible for severe violations of religious freedom.

I am a Muslim of Indian origin. And my family does come from Gujarat.

And no, you dont stand for either "free values". Very likely you are of Hindu origin and filled with nothing but hate. You historical and statistical reference are incorrect and you have not cited a source. I am quite well versed in Indian history.

Well .... what more can one say really? Its slightly obvious you have got nothing to do with "freedom" and its so appalling that a lot of people gall to stand for freedom but clearly just post messages of hate and violence?

As for chinese, hasnt USA officially always maintained that China has a poor record of human rights and in particular religious right and is an oppressive regime especially in response to Xingian (and not forgetting Tibet)?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".