Stand up to your POSTS

Submitted by Proud Indian (India), May 24, 2008 at 03:12

MANSOOR,

YOU WROTE "Look the bunch of falsehoods you are continuously preaching over here...

You compiled the so called statements which you assorted to my name...in fact they are highly fabricated and mis-represented."

hahaha , joke of the year! i have written only what you have stated in your posts buddy, now you are denying them! wow.. at least we stand by what we say. anyways , your denials stand in line with typical muslim behaviour...

You wrote "Hinduism long buried and folded in the so called Hindustan!!! "

Yes we were ruled by the MUGHALS FOR 700 years . by the British for 200 hundred years, BUT WE ARE STILL A 87% STRONG HINDU NATION. ( MINORITY APPEASING POLITICIANS CALL US BY INDIA ) BUT WE STILL CALL IT HINDUSTAN.. HINDUISM DIED IN 1947 ONLY IN THE NEW COUNTRY CALLED AS PAKISTAN WHEN ALL SO CALLED PEACEFUL MUSLIMS MASSACARRED THE LOCAL HINDUS AND SIKHS STAYING IN THE NEWLY FORMED NA-PAKI-STAN!

YOU WROTE - "Suparco is doing well in the limited resources and we are totally in understanding that we are not here to compare Pakistan with India"

Oh, so you are in total agreement that Pakistan is a puny country and i am bieng unfair comparing india's progress with pakistans? why do think so? we both started out free from british raj on the same day!!! infact you had one day head start.. You recieved alms of 55crores from us.. You declared yourself as an ISLAMIC STATE so that you can formally liquidate the minority.. so what went wrong mansoor?? why is pakistan on the verge of bieng labelled a terrorist state and INDIA is amongs the developed nations? I get it, you invest more in buiding minarets for mosques than rockets for suparco. Moreever you started comparison in the first place , not me..

you wrote "because it is highly illogical. and you fools are unable to compare yourself with China who entered like lightning in your country in 1962 clinching much of Ladakh, can you discuss it?"

Like a true slave who lives off china security , you are waxing eloquence about your master CHINA, are you chinese mansoor? do see any chinese debating here with me? 1962 was a defeat for INDIA i accept that, I dont have delusions that we trapped the chinese in the mountains of ladakh , nor i complain that the AMERICANS ASKED US NOT TO RETALIATE LIKE YOU THEORIZE ABOUT KARGIL . LETS TALK ABOUT THE PRESENT.. CHINA HAS INVITED US TO JOIN THE BRIC coalition compromising of BRAZIL , RUSSIA , INDIA & CHINA, PAKISTAN NOT INVITED.. THATS BECAUSE SLAVES ARE SLAVES AND CANNOT SIT WITH MASTERS!!! GET IT ?? NOW DONT JUMP HIGH OR DIVE IN FOOLS PONDS

You wrote - "You are drunk in the mistaken idea that you have followed western footstep but frankly you are bringing your respectable ladies on the ramp..bare footed, bareheaded and nude..."

AGAIN YOU BRING NUDITY IN YOUR POSTS? WHAT IS IT MANSOOR? OH I GET IT.. YOU DONT HAVE ENOUGH OF IT IN PAKISTAN WHERE YOU BUNDLE YOUR WOMEN FROM HEAD TO TOE IN NIQAB, I THOUGHT PIOUS MUSLIMS DONT VIEW WOMEN LIKE SEX OBJECTS, SO WHY DO MUSLIM WOMEN FEEL THE URGE TO COVER THEMSELVES FROM HEAD TO TOE IN YOUR COUNTRY? FRANKLY IT IS YOUR DESPERATION WHICH MAKES YOU MENTION SEX AND NUDITY HERE!

WE ALL KNOW WHAT YOU DID TO MUKHTAR MAI.. MANIACS ALL OF YOU!!! WE DONT FORCE THEM ON THE RAMP BUDDY, THIS IS A FREE COUNTRY! ATLEAST WE RESPECT FREEDOM OF CHOICE.. HERE NO PUNDIT WAITS OUTSIDE THE FASHION SHOW TO SLIT THE THROAT OF THE MODELS LIKE YOU DO ..

So once again, stand up to your posts, your memory is weakening, thats why you dont remember what you write..

Since you called me a "BACHHCAY " WHICH MEANS CHILD.. LET ME REMIND YOU THAT THIS CHILD HAS AN ILLEGIMATE SON CALLED PAKISTAN..

Yours Truly

Proud Indian

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".