Sure, "Pazal", I'll relax while "taqiyya" covers up the true nature of violent jihad. I haven't made the least bit of "fun" of your virulent religion ...

Submitted by kman (United States), Oct 11, 2010 at 16:43

More to the point, I find it deplorable and backstabbing. You "don't make fun of anyone's beliefs". What an understatement of irrelevancy. Jihad calls for the violent overthrow of other religions, which you continually play obtuse over. "Defending" yourself? Responding to WTC was hardly an aggression on our part.

A mad man (Saddam Hussein) with Hitler like intents running wild in the Middle East while Arab nations did nothing to reign him (to their own severe detriment) isn't something that the world should shrug their shoulders over. Our move there was hardly one of aggression against Islam or the Arab peoples. It was as much to protect and deliver them as it was to protect the threat of world commerce due to the importance of your vast reserves of oil.

Did I say anything about "revenge"? Not a word. Facing up to the realities of the cancerous growth of Islam's violent jihad and fighting back against it, is hardly "revenge". You can play with terminology all you want. It's beside the point when we all know which "jihad" dominates in the minds of Muslims. Islam is the aggressor, not us.

You also evade addressing the militant ventures of Islam in Europe. Why so silent? Why the attempt to deflect the dialogue? Why are Christians assaulted by Muslims in Dearborn Michigan for expressing a few questions?

Did I say I refused to read a Saudi funded book? Where did you get that impression? Obtuse deflection again? The incursion of the Saudis into ALL of our big universities speaks not only of California. It does speak to the insidious nature of Islam to bribe its way into favor along with the inimidation of the campus radicals. Again, the duplicitous and contradictory nature of the Quran and its prophet. Would you care to speak to this "moderate" and "peaceful" method of spreading Islam?

Speak also of the common practice of going into our prisons and instead of preaching a loving, forgiving, and peaceful God, reaching out to angry criminals with the doctrine of violent "revenge".

You seem to take for granted that I back all of my government's or even my peoples' addiction to oil. I don't back my nation in many things including the pornography that Middle Easterners are so silently addicted to themselves while denouncing the west for its own addiction.

The Muslim practice of desecrating their own Qurans and then planting them to make it look like a Christian act is widespread throughout all Muslim countries. I will repeat, the FREQUENT atrocities of Muslims against all minorities makes the charges of minority malfeasance ridiculous in light of the heinous and rampant responses indiscriminately thrown back at them. How ludicrous and transparent. In light of the also, frequent kidnapping of minority little girls and gang raping them, selling them to Muslim lords to "marry" and forcefully convert to Islam, then dispose of when tiring, how can you even dare to plant a lie so trivial in comparison?

How about the mass burnings of Christian churches? The burning of thousands of pieces of Christian literature, Bibles, and belongings? You fail to addresss so many questions and then suggest I should "relax"?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".