Establishment of Apostate Status by Content or Critique of Content

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Nov 8, 2021 at 15:39

In many of the dissertations that observer DNM provided over the years in this forum, it did not take this observer too very long to discern those observations were well thought out litmus tests of philosophical parsings of critical processes in which it became apparent that no one individual was fully responsible for the content of Quranic ideologies; that while the same was being said of the Torah and Tanakh, the authorship of the Hebrew Holy Scriptures have an evidentiary confirmation unparalleled in the annals of human history that cannot be mimicked by any other attempts of similar religious ascriptions. All others are betrayed by their obvious subsequent interdictions of lesser theosophical ideologies that are too easily manipulated by human reasoning and erudite intellectualistic desires to replace truth with their lesser logic. Of such is the downfall of humanistic tendencies that fail to learn the lessons of eternity.
This is the key this observer was able to discern from DNM about the Quran and why it could not take away the truth regarding the Torah and Tanakh and the Person they represent as the ruler of eternity>

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".