For Fadil Habib and Muslim logic! Real names and "screen names"

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 27, 2006 at 18:43

My Dear Fadil this is what your name would be in the language of Arabian imperialism: Arabic that is but again like I said; "Old civilizations are not conjured away not by Islam and not by Arabian imperialism" and the sounds of your nacestors come across loud and clear in the way you vocalize and write your name: Fazal

Then you claim that you are not 3Alim and that is fine with me, but I expect some common sense.

The Pope was very much talking about what I did mention to you in my post and that is:

1. Islam is violent.

2. Muhammad did not bring any new teachings to man/woman kind.

3. Jihad aka holy war aka harb muqadassa is illogical and cannot be the will of a God.

4. Islam was spread through violence and by the sword (remember the sword verse?).

This is what the Pope was really saying. And you know what he was right on!

Mahmud of Ghazni was a thug and a killer and a maniac and shame on you Pakistanis for celebrating the life of such killer.

As for Jerusalem and the Crusades:

1. The Crusades were coducted despite of the teachings in Chrisitanity.

You? your Allah tells you to go and fight the people of the book for no reason what so ever and then he asks Muslims to get the poor dhimmis to pay the _mafia tax_ called Jizya (Q9:20)

2. The crusades were a response to the Arab/Muslim invasion or the Muslim/Arab crusades of the Middle East starting in 633CE. Remember that your Allah tells you and other Muslims that you must fight those that take your land. So I do not see why would your God be unhappy with the crusades! The Middle east was a Christian/Jewish land in the late antique period.

Remember my dear Fadil that "what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander." As a matter of fact your Allah would be very happy with the crusades! The Judeo-Christian God would not be happy with such nasty war as the crusades.

3. The Muslim invasion of the Middle east and the crimes of Muslims against humanity are too many to count including the genocide of your own ancestors by Muslims. And the Muslim crusades and Muslim violence from 633CE until the 9/11 Atrocity was _instigated_ by your Allah

4. So how many indeed died at Jerusalem in 1099 CE? The darling of Muslims Karen Armstrong claims that 40,000 were killed. But Ms Armstrong is a very poor historian. The number 40,000 is called an historical topos and it only means that many were killed and it could be any number and only Allahu a3lam.

So you see my dear Fadil we do not know how many were killed and it was a crime no doubt even if only one human being was killed. You? You belittle the claims by the people of India againt the monster Mahmud of Ghazni. Shame.

As for posting under your real name or not I care less if you do or do not, I like my screen name, and get used to it.

As for the 9/11 atrocity I can only blame islam.

And as for your comment about history: we here in the West need to know our enemy and that is islam and defeat it in the market place of ideas. And no we do not wish to convert to Islam and would rather be Nijis and Kuffar than to be Muslims.

The rest of your post? It was the usual blah....blah...blah...

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".