For Salman and Mahmud of Ghazni, wannabe Arabs and his Hindu ancestors

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jan 1, 2007 at 08:14

My dear salman I wanted to leave this little gem about you being here to reply and explain and in the process defend the religion of the arabs which you ain't one. Now I can very much say:

1. You do not know any Arabic and knowing Arabic is really a must in-order to really understand islam. So what are you going to do about it?

2. You ain't no Arab and the Qur'an makes it very clear that muhammad was only sent to the Arabs as a prophet. This makes you another wannabe Arabs but for sure not an Arab. This one there is nothing you can do about it you are in the eyes of the Arabs another Bakistani and for sure no Arab!

3. Then you seem to have no clue what is really "Sirat Rasul Allah" by Ibn ishaq or al-Waqidi's al-Maghazi. These are the two major sources about the life of Muhammad the prophet of the Arabs but not of Tablighees like you. This goes into the class of ignorance. So are you ignorant or intellectualy dishonest my dear Salman? Which one is it?

4. But the most absurd thing about you is you are trying to distance yourself from your ancestors the Hindus and your total disregard for the Hindu genocide by no other than Mahmud of Ghazni is symptomatic of wannabe Arabs like you Shame

So why are you here my dear salman?

Stay tuned for more.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".