To Fyldefolly - re lack of reply

Submitted by Isis (Australia), Apr 4, 2009 at 10:18

I apolgise for not responding sooner but there was nothing dire in my inaction. The reasons are as follows -

1. I didn't read and haven't read your post so there was no need to respond. My responses are only directed to those who provide intelligent and informative content.

2. I haven't had a reliable ISP lately - Egypt is Egypt!.

3. Contrary to your suggestion, I have no doubts at all about my relationship - solid and very happy, thank you.

I hope that this alleviates your concerns.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".