What is really al-jihad as defined by no other than al-Tabari and the disaster of the missing Ta marbouta!

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Oct 6, 2012 at 11:48

It is really annoying when Muslims the likes of Zuma that cannot read speak or write Arabic try to tell us kuffar what the Qur'an really says

As the word, kill, in Quran could be interpreted as repentance of non-muslims, the extract above could be interpreted as

This is what al-Tabari tells us about the tafseer of Q2:219 where it says:

والذين هاجروا وجاهدوا في سبيل الله

Or and those that immigrated and fought holy war in the cause of Allah

And this is his tafseer of the word jahidu

وجاهدوا فأنه يعني وقاتلوا وحاربوا

Or and jahidu means those that fought and declared war

And the war here is holy war which means that the word jahidu here means those that were fighting a holy war which means that the verbal noun jihad really means holy war!

How come you did not know that our dear Zuma? and why do you pontificate about a language that you cannot read speak read or write you tell me

And here is your bonus for today our dear Zuma: Spot the mistake in the book of Allah and it is in the same aya

Blah....blah....blah رحمت الله

You see our dear Zuma if a child who is learning Arabic would write the word رحمة as رحمت as we find it in the book of Allah he'she will flunk his Arabic language class

And what is most absurd is that the Saudis in their web site qur'an.al-islam.com leave the incorrect word رحمت in the Quranic text but the word is edited in the introduction to al-Tabari exegesis of the verse and it becomes the correct: رحمة

this means that they are editing a mistake in the Qur'an

What a disaster

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".