Unrealistic Outcome

Submitted by Mjolnir (United Kingdom), Apr 14, 2008 at 19:25

As was pointed out, in Daniel Pipes's article, Europeans have, in general, rejected Christianity and have adopted various forms of secularism. This means that it is most unlikely that there will be a mass conversion of Muslims, in Europe, to Christianity; on the contrary, it is more likely that increasing numbers of spiritually bankrupt Europeans will turn to Islam. Furthermore, Muslims will never accept multiculturalism and women's rights etc. Muslims (both moderate and radical) have an underlying desire for a global Islamic "caliphate" which will never be abandoned.

I believe that there are only two possible outcomes:

1. Nationalist parties are brought to power throughout Europe, leading to a re-assertion of the indigenous culture and a complete halt to the islamification process. This would either be carried out peaceably (i.e. with no violent resistance by Muslims) or, much more likely, after a violent struggle that may or may not be considered a true civil war.

2. The current crop of liberal-left, treacherous Islam-appeasing governments remain in power, leading to a gradual acceptance of sharia law and general dhimmitude throughout Eurabia (resulting in a truly horrendous future for our children and grandchildren - especially our daughters).

Unfortunately, the second option is the most likely outcome (though I hope, with all my heart, that I am wrong).

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".