deCONSTRUCTION is the antithesis of constructive thought

Submitted by trans-parere (Canada), Apr 16, 2008 at 10:22

What ultimate value would Europe be for any Islamic Ummah per se? What glory lies in the destruction of that which one finds enviable? Moslem's would turn The British Parliament buildings into a toilet as they did the Catholic Churches of Belgium, when those good people gave them shelter there. Out breeding the ideology [freedom and democracy] that gives you nourishment, a roof over your head, employment, medical and technological advancement, is not a statement of ideological supremacy. It's mass suicide. It's the cutting off of ones nose to spite the face. Naturally, and here I understand Islam. One would need the burqa to conceal such innate stupidity.

Europe is industrial. Europe under Islam would come to a screeching halt and with in a hundred years all those Moslem's who survive their supposed victory would be jumping ship and whinging at the door of some other developed country to give them the work and the opportunities they want and admire but, Islam as governing agent cannot provide.

The "WEST" is industrial. China is industrial. Japan is industrial. Moslem dominated countries are not industrial and lack the capacity to care for and keep up what little mechanical equipment brought to them by their industrial neighbours. The Moslem countries are fed, clothed, built, and maintained by WESTERN workers. WESTERN technologies. Islam as government has nothing to offer it's citizenship.

This is my impression of Islam given to me by Moslem countries the world over. I see no reason to encourage that cultural, economic, and governmental dysphoria. The governing principles of Islam are not self-sustainable. There is no cultural advancement built into such rigid dependency that is needed to control the individual, nor any inherent trust in the truth [if such exist] of their doctrine. Islamic societies have a great need for policing the thoughts and expression of their citizens. Conversely, Democracies encourage independence of the people and their thoughts and our police act to ensure public safety and the freedoms of the individual.

An Islamic Ummah would be a dead world of families at war with families. Neighbours at war with neighbours. And once productive countries devastated shells whose infrastructure would not be worth the energy to repair.

The world does not need any more from the deconstructionist. We have inherited enough of that nonsense from the European Reactionist[s], the death of great thinkers, and our centres of higher education suffer that consequence. That "socialism" is the gateway for any Islamification and the intolerance of any diversity of thought. Some have forgotten it is that diversity of thought that has given us the resulting multitude of invention. Our true and real wealth. There is room for Islam as a religion but, none for such a stifling, prejudicial and totalitarian form of government.

The real question is not will the WEST survive Islam. It is will Moslem's awake in time to take control of their doctrine, encourage diversity, openly encourage free thinking and advance as constructive human beings to become contributors in this next century of man? Not be an avowed enemy of freedom trapped by a doctrine that's only goal is to dominate every aspect of the individuals life.

Islamification is not an attack so much on Western ideals as it is a death shroud over the Moslem as individual. Most unfortunate is the behavior and politics of the organisations like C.A.I.R. and such Islamic Councils in the free world who are positioned to truly influence the doctrinal direction of Islam and to bring that expression more in line with a inclusive 21st century. To encourage a Moslem independence that favours the individual over the collective. There is no trust inherent in the doctrine of Islam, and sooner or later some Moslem will have to stand up in the face of the practices of Islam and begin the internal jihad whose goal will be to enshrine trust as part of the ideology. And remove the distrust towards it's practitioners mandated by the authoritarian orientation prescribed by Muhammad to ensure his absolute rule.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".