Our dear Nura and the word pathological, the islamic crusades, Arabian imperialism and poor Muslim logic

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), May 10, 2008 at 07:24

Our dear Nura wrote

>It is pathological how many "educated" People conveniently forget history.

Well let me paraphrase what you wrote: It is very pathological when Muslims have no clue and are in denial about the violent history of Islam that was instigated (Arabic tahird) by Allah who demands that he and his rasul get 1/5 of the loot collected through Muslim violence (Q8:41). So if our dear Nura have Allah or his Rasul e-mail addresses we need to let them know that they need to collect lots of loot collected from the victims of Arabian imperialism included here would be our dear Nura's ancestors

>Christianity has the bloodiest history of ANY other religion in the world.

Well I have three questions for you:

1. What do you mean by bloodiest?Are we talking about number of victims? jizya collection? oh wrong religion! Are we talking about the number of wars? So what are you talking about our dear Nura?

2. And where would I find teachings in Christianity that would link such bloody history with Christian teachings?And where would I find in the NT anything close to:

Q9:5 or iqtoloo al-mushrikeen or kill the polytheists or Q9:29 and qatilo blah...blah...ahl al-kitab or fight the prople of the book (our dear Nura your Allah is telling you to fight the people that you live with here in the US and would you do that our dear Nura?) Q9:111 yuqatiluun fi sabeel allah fayuqtiluun wa yuqtaluun or and they fight in the casue of Allah and they kill and get killed Your Allah also asks Muslims to terrorize the infidles

So much for Allah and his tahrid (inciting) and violence.

3. And remember that your point is only valid if you can link cause and effect as in:

A. There are indeed teachings in Christianity that tell Christians to fight and kill and invade and enslave and ask the infidels to pay a jizya tax. Oh darn it the wrong religion again.

B. That based on such teachings Christians now have this bloody history

Now this is your chance to shine our dear Nura al-falyasoofa al-kabeera

>This is undisputed.

Undisputed by whom? by you our dear Nura rabina yunawar 3aqlaha al-sagheer?So where is your evidence here as in history books and the following will not be regarded as evidence:

1. Bogus Paki/Muslim web sites

2.wikipedia

3. My Mullah told me so

I will be waiting with great anticipation

>Forced conversions is the history of Christianity.

Well let me see: where would I find in the NT anyhting about forced conversions of let us say the polytheists? Now in the Qur'an a book that you cannot read in Arabic it says: iqtoloo al-mushrikeen. How come you did not know that our dear Nura?

>The Spanish Inquisition, Crusades where children were impaled and cannibalism took place, slavery,colonization,imperialism is a history of European nations.

But our dear Nura the Arabs invaded the Middle East what I like to call Islamic/Arabian crusades with and to quote you: slavery, colonization and imperialism and your ancestors our dear Nura were vicitms of such crusades and more likely than not had to convert to the religion of the arabs.

You are here defending Arabian imperialism that brutalized your ancestors and for this I say shame

As for the rest of your post you must pardon me our dear Nura, but it is nothing but islamic drivel

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".