accuse...accuse very easy parrot talking. Let's discuss today, now, here.

Submitted by yasemin (Turkey), Apr 8, 2009 at 05:13

Kevin,

History is not what you read from a magazine or what you here someone says or what you remember from your school days. I will never dare to blame a whole nation with very primitive and limited "knowledge" of their history. I am not going to teach you any of our history, which all of you will be very very ashamed. But if you care I can send yourself the realities about what you've mentioned, from the Armenian and English archives, in which they claim those days, just the opposite of what they claim today. Anyway all the archives are open now to be read, Soviet, English and Ottoman. Only Armenians themselves do not open their archives. Why? Before reading it is parrot talking.

And it is very easy just to talk. But talking should not be accusing the other. For example everybody only accuse Hitler but never talk about how much support was given to him by Europe and US, financially and tactically, just believing he would crash Soviet. Even the top holly people were silent and supportive to this destruction of humanity.

For example what I heard from your media was this; Biggest companies of the west, which I won't mention the names here but you can reach that information easily, was directly involved in the geoncide of Hitler's. They designed and manufactured the ovens so that killing and burning the bodies could be faster. In the end of the war no country was innocent. The war ended when it was understood that Hitler was defeated by Soviets. So when Hitler was no use for them anymore they did what they do always; SHOW TIME, being THE HERO; rescuing the people of the camps.! Tooooo late.

If we are here to accuse starting from the ancient Greece, which a friend here had already did, and do this with our limited knowledge, then what's the use? What's the difference of the platforms then, that common people of the world are communicating themselves apart from the media and politicians?

We should talk what we see. Not what we were thought and read. It will only be meaningful if we share what we see in our own surroundings and what we experience and are affected ourselves. Then this will be real. Not poltics. To be amateur journalists or politicians is not our goal, is it?

Of course if the platform moderator do not canalize according to some politics or beliefs

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".