"All civilization is Turkic in origin" or world history Turkified

Submitted by Ianus (Poland), Apr 14, 2009 at 10:25

Hi, dhimmi no more !

Thanks a lot for your kind words !

> You know I call the islamic historical tradition as the biggest literary fraud in the history of mankind but it seems that the Turks are very close second<

I'd rather call them "first". The Arab liars saw all pre-Islamic history as 'jakhilya' - "the Age of Ignorance" that hadn't contributed anything at all to civilization and just perverted the true faith by polytheism. The Turkish counterfeiters and swindlers see it as a mistake. They know grand civilizations existed in the past. They can see their ruins in Anatolia. Instead of ignoring them they have declared the Turks to be the authors and heirs of all civilizations and fathers and masters all races !!!

The Arabs needed centuries to impose their perverted and stupid myths and lies as 'true history'. The Turks needed just one history congress in 1932 in Ankara and Ataturk's word of honour to accept the new lies and fairy tales as self-evident axioms they are now ready to die for.

This bullsh... is elaborated in "Prof." Silahi Diker's standard book "And the Whole Earth Was One Language - Ten Thousand Years of the Turks", 1996 (revised edition 1999) . I.al. our state-paid Kemalist professor "proved" that :

"1. The Japhetic language assumed to be the origin of the Kurdish language and the Armenian language is a Turkish dialect. Japheth, his brother Shem and their father Prophet Noah were Sumerians who spoke a Turkish language.

2. Epic stories such as Homer's Iliad, Firdawsi's Shahname and Virgil's Aeneid were most likely originally written or told in some Turkish dialect. In the first two, the heroes fighting on both sides were most likely Turkish - speaking peoples.

3. First Cretan civilizations were most likely created by Turkish -speaking peoples. Etruscans were a Turkic people.

4. From the borrowed words we have found in the Sumerian Turkish, we may deduct that other languages especially Indo-European Iranian and the Semitic Arabic were also well developed in the ancient world of the Sumerians.

5. All alphabets including Arabic and Latin are continuation of the Aramaic alphabet. Amongst these, Gokturk (Kok - Turk) alphabet stands apart as the most perfect with several independent modifications, additions and improvements to accommodate hard or soft vowels and their associated consonants."

It's interesting to learn from official Turkish "scholars" like Selahi Diker and his ilk that the indigenous Indian peoples of North and South America are of course Turks ! American civilizations are therefore Turkic in origin too. This is "proved" by a map showing the migrations of the 'Turkic peoples' beyond the Bering Strait.

http://www.rozanehmagazine.com/NoveDec05/AzarbayeganPart1.html

[ Do you understand now why our yasemin wrote "US belongs to Indians" , 'I love Indians' ? :]

The perfidious and ignorant Turk has even found a way to circumvent and disarm your reproach :

> Here you have an Asian group of people that invade and destroy the Byzantine Empire and then they also convert to an alien Arab religion (Islam that is) <

The Turks hallucinate that Byzantium was also Turkic in origin and so they took only their due in 1453. Even the history of Islam - although this was hardly foreseen or wished by Ataturk - has not been spared happy Turkification. There is a recent "discovery" that the Prophet Mohammad was Turkish in origin. He didn't come from the Qureish tribe, but from a Turkic tribe and his real name was Memad-Oglu. And so Islam being founded by a Turk is fully compatible with Turkishness and its superhuman qualities as demonstrated by 10000 years of recorded Turkic "history".

An older 1936 New York Times account of the Ataturkish historical science fiction can be seen at

http://www.azargoshnasp.net/recent_history/pan_turkist_philosophy/turksteachnewtheories.htm

On a general note, what can one expect from people who are brought up in the spirit of pan-Turkic racism reinforced by Islamic supremacism? Why is one so surprised that Turks are anti-American and anti-Semitic , that they deny the Greek and Armenian and Assyrian genocide they have committed?

With his new Ataturkic ideology the Turk considers himself even more than before entitled to command and rule the whole world. He is being told after all that it is his great ancestors that have founded everything of value on earth and he is their legitimate heir. So what can we expect from these 'superhuman' heirs to the world mastery except new genocides , new aggressions and new lies ?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".