PRIVATE PROPERTY

Submitted by BERK akk (Turkey), May 2, 2009 at 18:51

Ianus,you are wery much influenced by a wrong propaganda .Most probably greek propaganda trying to find christ,jew ,armenian supporter for their helen dream.ATATURK in all his life was not jihadist furthermore his belief of islam religion is still under discussion.Both secularist and islamist comuntiy has only one agreement that is Atatürk never was islamist and a jihadist.

"You are "not in favor of historical otoman empire holy war"? ... Remarkable mentality ! So now what you are not in favour of mustn't exist , needn't it ?" I am totaly in favor of T.C.Otoman empire simply ended.What is the wrong with my mentality.

" that most probably there is not a single ANZAC grave that hasn't been desecrated " .Cemeteries another discussion.Few yeasr ago i visisted .was realy good like a garden.But go anywhere in turkey ,they respect soldiers died in gelipoli.Common sense says they are our sons lost their lifes in our lands.Me also feel so .Please respect my observation and dont say lie.A small request.

What did the Greeks do 40 km from Anakara" , you will ask ? No İ will not ask Ianus.You realy have good quality in your writings.This would bring a shadow to quality in the discussion:)

"Moudros Turkey was obliged to meet a number of important political and military stipulations and make concessions" May be first we must discuss definition of land and property.Whole turkey lands were private property of ottoman dynesty including people on it..But they lost the war for countless reasons and made an agreement...They forget someting about their peoples thousands of years tradition."Looser commander cant make any agrrements."it was such an agreement..Looser are always trashed in to historys garbage dump.

"Greeks were acting as the armed hand of the Entente to see to it that the Turks complied with the stupulations of the agreements they had signed." See above.Signed contract was between a property owner and entente.Looser commander can not make an agreement.Atatürk was the new leader to make any agreement.

"I am waiting for its continuation of it in its secularist vs. Islamist form" I wonder which one do you want to win.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".