initial discussion

Submitted by berk akk (Turkey), May 1, 2009 at 13:51

"You are twisting things now - trying to prove a point which you did not make. Now you're trying to say it was the SS fault that Muslims were involved"

"The subject was NOT who was responsible for the killings of millions in WW2 - it was you statement that NO muslims were involved or took sides in WW2"

Our initial discussion was remember you claimed muslim anxiety against "values" you have.Then i answered you the values "even i am agree on such values nearly 90% "there have also killed more than 5 0 million people on ww2 and claimed nobody from muslim side was in that war.I have used wrong term "nobody". I accepted 2,6% later at least assumed .Please make the correlation of very initial point "values" claim and current point responibility and "numbers".

you've contradicted yourself by saying many fought with the Russians?"...sory .think i used wron word.i meant muslim soldiers within the russian army against ss.

"You have not yet admitted you were wrong" I can admit there was groups used as a tool by SS for their nationalist goals .But the whole responsibility is ss arrised in center of "value".

G.I.K .According to my self observations among my daily life I can tell you that there had not existed and still not exist any positive approach to SS in Turkish puplic by a great extend.Taking small number of percentages for a general judgement may bring wrong results.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".