Imdad: Your call to accept Muhammad as apostle of God is a call to accept Islam

Submitted by Plato (India), Mar 17, 2008 at 23:39

>>They are so cynical and sinister in their nefarious design that they call it Mohammedanism rather than religion of God like Christianity and Judaism.<<

Imdad Ali you consider merely calling Islam, Mohammedaniss sinister. Now take another look at your next sentence and what is really sinister is exposed.

>>Until and unless, western people are not accepting Holy Prophet as a Messenger of God, controversy will go on. It is dirty game, which is fought in the name of religion.<<

Instead of clearly spelling out that the West must come under the yoke of Islam you phrase it in words you think are inoffensive. The reply to your call to accept Muhammad as a Messenger of God was given by by Suhayl b. Amr when the Prophet dictated the words of the treaty of Hudaybia:

...Then he (Muhammad) said: 'Write "This is what Muhammad, the apostle of God has agreed with Suhayl b Amr"' Suhayl said, 'If I witnessed that you were God's apostle I would not have fought you. Write your own name and the name of your father.'The apostle said: 'Write "This is what Muhammad b. Abdullah has agreed....."

This is the reply you will get from present day pagans (and others) in the West, East, North and South. We accept Muhammad as the son of Abdullah, neither he nor his followers have been able to show that he is the Apostle of God.

Regards,

Plato

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".