Our dear Meghan agrees that the Qur'an is violent and as if we did not know

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Feb 23, 2009 at 06:57

Our dear Meghan... writes

>After all, the Bible - at least the Old Testament - is at least as violent and hate-filled as many people claim the Qur'an is.

OK darling let me see: so are you saying that what is wrong with us infidles the OT is violent and so is the Qur'an

Then congratulations our dear Meghan as you are saying that the Qur'an is violent. You think that i should tell the wahhabis that a maskeen min el-bakistan like you is saying that the Qur'an is violent? Oh let me guess: they will agree with you

> Heck, Sinhalese are killing Tamils in the name of Buddhism - shall we ban that, too?

What does this have to do with banning the Qur'an? and are the Sinhalese a book darling?We are talking about banning a violent book called the Qur'an. What a fake

>I wear the veil, but I am a staunch feminist.

Darling: so what is under the veil? let me guess a guy who is another Paki/tablighee just like Nura who wishes to be a woman right? Nothing wrong with wanting to be a woman darling

>? I read the Qur'an,

Really? let me guess in Urdu?

>but I am a staunch socialist.

Oh and I'm mother Teresa from Berkina Fasso

>I have faith, and just because terrorists hijacked my religion doesn't mean I should be robbed of that.

Robbed of what darling? common sense or is it cerdibility? You have no credibility darling and I pity you

Oh and I urge you to abandon islam that brutalized your Hindu ancestors and oh get a real grip on life darling

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".