Paul Craig Roberts – August 1, 2018, Latest Blood Libel: On the Probable Use of Christian Blood in Ceremonies.

Submitted by Robert (United States), Sep 3, 2018 at 19:59

Drear Mr. Debanjan Banerjee,

I'm not going to answer more than one-point-at-a-time which you raise because you apparently subscribe to the views of a notorious Conspiracy Theorist who also now believes in the probable truth that religious Jews used the Blood of Christian Children in Religious Ceremonies:

Paul Craig Roberts – August 1, 2018, Blood Libel
"How Real Is Anti-Semitism?"
"Ron Unz, a Jew, is the straightest talking bravest person I know"
"It does seem likely that a significant number of traditionally-religious Jews did indeed occasionally commit the ritual murder of Christian children in order to use their blood in certain religious ceremonies"
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/08/01/how-real-is-anti-semitism/

In Western Science we don't prove that something isn't true - rather, we gather proof to support a theory.

What your "authority" (above) does is typical, he quotes someone else who says that Jewish Ritual (a known "libel" against the Jews) "is probably true."

The fact that you rely on such "authority" as Mr. Paul Craig Roberts shows me that answering more than one point of yours is probably a waist of the time and space of Dr. Daniel Pipes.

I expect you to tell me how much "Christian blood" is needed is such "probable ritual ceremony"?

I would LOVE to hear your answer to this question first, relating to my Ad Hominid attack on your Paul Craig Roberts. An Ad Hominum argument has the benefit of saving much valuable time. A person who holds the most absurd view in one area, probably does so elsewhere, and arguing with such a person gets one nowhere. But in your case, I'll make an exception - if you respond to my attack on the intellectual integrity of your source, PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".