1970-1980 Follower of Lyndon LaRouche, David Goldman

Submitted by Robert (United States), Sep 17, 2018 at 14:43

Dear Mr. Debanjan Banerjee,

You seem to be a follower of Conspiracy Theorists. Lately, David Goldman is re-branded as a Conservative- whatever that means. Conservatives in this country, in recent decades, have joined and more or less dominated the Republican Party, but they have failed to produce a coherent doctrine - the result being that Populist Donald Trump has been elected President on the simple slogan of MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. The Soviet Union and Communism having been defeated, under Trump there are only 2 adversaries that are opposing America's GREATNESS: (1) China, with its unfair trading policies, (2) Islamism with Israel and Iran on the major Front Line.

On November 4 - to the day - we will observe the Anniversary when American hostages were held for 444 days by the Iranian "revolutionaries" in 1979,during the Democratic Carter administration. On that day, in the coming November, the USA will enforce Zero-Tolerance for buying Iranian Oil and its derivatives.

Regarding China, Trump will impose, on an unknown day further TARIFFS on China unless its negotiates a better deal or terms in trade.

I haven't read your Link because you haven't convinced me that there is any valid argument to be found in the writing of a former LaRouche follower.

The burden of convincing me that a Link of yours isn't a waste of my time is on You. Oswald Spengler (Decline of the West [1918]) and Franz Rosenzweig names associated with your Goldman. I assume that these notables are used by Goldman to expound some Revisionist ideology. But its for you to convince me that there is something in Goldman beyond another Conspiracy Theory, or another forecast of an Apocalypse. If you cannot do so, why should I not assume that your not merely pointing to another Crackpot Theory?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".