|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Motke: Arabic Lahma/Lahm! Meat? Or is it meal and or bread?Reader comment on item: Poll: Israel Victory Gains Strength Submitted by dhimmi no more, Nov 4, 2018 at 08:54 If you check Q2:174 the text tells us about Lahm al-Khanzeer or the Lahm of the pig However, the word meat in Arabic comes in two forms: 1. لحمة or Lahma (notice the Ta marbouta at the end) which is more likely than not from Syriac ܠܚܡܐ or Lakhma 2. In the above verse we have the word لحم or Lahm as in Beit Lahm or بيت لحم (house of bread) Here is Lisan al-'Arab and the word Lahm but it would be a stretch of imagination to read it as Ibn Manzur is saying that the word Lahm means meal or bread http://library.islamweb.net/newlibrary/display_book.php?idfrom=7458&idto=7458&bk_no=122&ID=7471 Ibn Kathir who was Syrian and seems to have been very knowledgeable in Syriac did not mention that the word Lahm also means bread or meal as far as I know! However, the meaning of Syriac ܠܚܡܐ could also be meal. So is the Qur'an talking about meal of pig's meat? And why would the author of the Qur'an seems to tell us that Lahm al-Khanzeer means pig's meat? We will never know! Notice that meat in Syriac is ܒܣܪܐ Bisra compare with Hebrew Basar (correct me if I'm wrong) but why would it be different in Arabic? Puzzling indeed Oh more? >"[he will] revolt": Arabic = /yatamarradu/, Hebrew = /yitmarred/ Very true. However, the "a" following the letter Ya is a short vowel in Arabic, and can be read as Yit or a kasra and not a fatha and the word would be yitmarradu and this is a common present tense prefix in Arabic >Hebrew's past form is closer to Aramaic than Arabic because it has the prefix "hit" (whereas Arabic starts right with the "ta"): This is very true however, yitgaddal is present tense! No? Thank you for a very stimulating discussion Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Reader comments (123) on this item |
Latest Articles |
|||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |