Ahmad, false proof

Submitted by Infidel (Canada), Mar 5, 2008 at 14:12

May I suggest that you read history instead of making it up? The history of Muhammad is available in many books, including the "Glorious Qur'an". Unfortunately, anything negative in the "Glorious Qur'an is always taken out of context; why 70% of the Qur'an is out of context.
Muhammad involved himself and his supporters in over 70 wars. His supporters converted to Islam because they lived a better life style, gained from robbing caravans, killing tribes and taking their wives for sex. Will you try to tell us that Muhammad robbed caravans so that he could attribute the profits to the, "treasury that was used to help the poor and civil services?"

The reason that Muhammad attacked the Quraishe tribe is because they refused to convert to Islam and there is no historical evidence that they gave him "a hard time." And no, Muhammad did not give the Quraishe tribe a hard time, he killed them.
What say you Ahmad, would you not rob caravans if you had 23 wives to support?

Ahmad, first you state that Muhammad used the loot to contribute to the treasury, to help the poor, civil services, to prepare an army, and then you state that Muhammad had to put together a system and build a country. Since the country had a Treasury, and civil services, sounds like the country didn't need Muhammad's help.

By the way, responders use sarcasm, when they know someone is contributing fabrications (also known as lies) of history.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".