The one who present dangers is the west

Submitted by basf (Indonesia), Mar 26, 2008 at 06:15

The one who present dangers is the west. They dont give a whit about Islamic laws. They dont give a whit about the holy Quran. What they give is the western judiciary system -the one supported by law, sometimes lobby, and also money.

A western judge never takes into account to the historical fact that Muhammad (May Allah praise him) once did TEAR a curtain at the home of his daughter, Fatimah, since it depicted human beings.

For moslems, the representation of Muhammad in the form of figure is never allowed. It is final, non-debatable. You dont question whether the real problem is "intended as form of idol worship" or not.

But do western judiciary system give a shit about that? Hell no.

They dont believe Muhammad a prophet. They only believe moslems believe Muhammad a prophet. So although Muhammad forbade moslems to make a representation of him in the form of figure, they still do that, on the basis that "he is s an important figure in the history of law; it is not intended as a form of idol worship."

So let me say my position clearly. I swear to something far greater than constitution, that is the holy quran. And it's not just me. Those rabbis and reverends also swear to Taurat and Bible far greater than to constitution.

But, since America are mostly christians, supreme court will never fully reject attempts to remove 10 commandment displays in school. Their law is biased. Any christian who believe that the refusal of a US Court to remove the statue of Muhammad is "fair" is making a joke.

Sometimes I wonder if there's an anti-holocaust cartoon in America (not in Iran, since it's nothing special). Can a cartoonist win a legal battle in US court by depicting anti-holocaust cartoon, perhaps, in the name of 'free speech and freedom of expression"?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".