I also love a Hindu who can argue without getting religion in

Submitted by Farman Naqvi (India), May 20, 2008 at 04:43

P I,

Your query is,

'ok tell me what line of thinking propogated the jaipur blasts, recent mumbai train blasts? you can't tell?'

It is the same thinking which had committed previous crimes also, have you got any clue for such blasts. The blasts happenned at Hyderabad, Jaipur, aurangabad, Akshardham etc. are the conduct of some forces who dosen't want that we Indians should live in peace. If Hindus & Muslims will not fight their aims will not be fulfilled, they can be any body but not a common Indian like you and me.

Tell me that while writing "......line of thinking propogated the jaipur blast...." who were the first people in your mind agaist whom your tirade was directed Sir P I. This is media and politician nexus which has created impression in your mind which reflected in your tirade. How one can say emphatically about any one when the administration itself is not pointing fingure towards any one.

Dear P I you must have read Sri Krishna Commission report relating to Bombay riots etc. It was concluded upon by the most devout Judge after examining records evidences, pointing finger towards politicians, police, admintrative authorities nexus. Thousands of such reports you can have from archives. Have you ever gave a cold thought that whether a Muslim can ever do damage to its own Mosque or religious place, I say emphatically NO. Once Supreme Court Of India had said that our administration during Gujrat riots sat like Nero, while Rome was burning, which act or ommission of the erstwhile administration forced SC to come to such a conclusion MY Dear P I.

The P I (Proud Indian) so far I understood is a self styled P I (Police Inspector).

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".