Muhammad's last sermon is very much anachronistic

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Sep 17, 2009 at 19:54

Hi Plato

Bilal,Translators of the Koran and Sira are adept at taqia. The prophet's sermon does not contain anything about "All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab is not superior over a non Arab nor a non Arab is superior over an Arab.."It starts with:" Know that every Muslim is a Muslim's brother, and that the Muslims are brethren. It is only lawful to take from a brother what he gives you willingly, so wrong not yourselves….". Ibn Ishaq

No do not assume that he is reading from Ibn Ishaq' s al-sira al-nabawiiyya I did ask him to provide me with his PRIMARY SORUCE IN ARABIC but he is ignorant and he will have no clue where to look for

But the real issue with the so called Muhammd's last sermon is that it is anachronistic and it has all the finger prints of the Persians that really created Islam because

1. If you examine the Qur'an you realize that who ever that Muhammad was he viewes himself as another Moses with a sacred language and a kitab or a book and a qawm or (his ) people and a hijra or an emigration and a cultic center! or Mecca and Muhammad if he exsited he was not very original in his thinking

2. The imagery of the Qur'an is very much ethnocentric (Q14:4) as per item one even the very smart Suyuti realized it

3. The early Arabs realized that islam is really the religion of the Arabs only and this is why we have the very well documneted concept of al-wali wa al-mawali or the fact that if you want to become Muslim back then then you must become an Arab first (and indeed early on Arabs did not want non Arabs to convert to islam) and this was done by a non Arabs becoming a mawali or a friends/followers of an Arab wali or master/friend but later on when there were more coverts than Arab waliis then the whole thing fell by the way side and this is why coverts in let us say Egypt speak Arabic but those in India do not

4. It is very clear that Muhammad's last sermon that was more likely than not composed in the 3rd century of islam by no other than Persians and it is is very anachronistic as many Persians want to be Arabs really bad and that is my point

Oh did you know that this creep told me that my blood is halal and that is fine with me

Now my question to you is: what is the matter with these Indian/Pakistani and Bangladeshi Muslims? they are really stupid

Allah has excised non-Muslims from the brotherhood of man.

Regards

Plato

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".