Our dear Amina and islamic hypocricy

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Oct 4, 2009 at 08:43

Our dear Amina the follower of deen al-irhab wa rab al-irhab wa rasul al-irhab

>Maybe we should ban WEAPONS

Good idea and let me see if we turn back the clock with no weapons there would be no islam and no islamic imperialism and your likes would not be victims of islam and its imperialism

>and not CLOTHES,

Really? so would Muslims stop banning let us say swim wear for women?

>now wouldn't that be a wiser decision?

What wiser decision? Oh the banning?

> It might even be worthwhile to work on a counter-terrorism strategy,

Here is a plan: Ban the Qur'an and declare it as hate literature and we will be all OK

> I do believe that would be useful.

What is the "that" darling?

> Or no, for extra precaution, if we do end up banning the niqab, let's get rid of scarves and handkerchiefs and tea towels and anything that might remotely function as a face veil.

That might not be a bad idea

>But that's no good. Perhaps we should get rid of clothes altogether! That's right, we should ban ALL clothes that can afford to conceive weapons. If we all ran around naked we wouldn't need to worry whether somebody was armed or not.

OK you start and we will follow you. Deal?what a demagogue

>Wake up and smell the ... coffee. Banning a piece of cloth is not going to suppress crime,

But darling banning face cover does not "supress crime" ya ayuha al-falyasoofa al-kabeera it only allows cameras to take a picture of the person with his/her face exposed and if this person breaks the law then et voila we have a picture of his/her face and the police can look for that person and I'm sure those wishing to break the law would think twice. But if the person covers his/her face then we do not have a picture now do you get it darling?

But again Aristotelian logic is beyond the Muslim mind

Did you get that much darling or are you that clueless?

>it only instigates greater sentiments of Islamophobia

Oh the islamophobia!

OK darling let us have a deal: Muslims should delete all the hate in the Qur'an and the anti-Semitism ( as in calling the Jews khanazeer wa quruud) and Christianophobia (as in denegrating the let us say the Trinity) and Hinduphobia and Buddhistophobia (sp?) and the hate of pagans and non Muslims (being regareded as unclean) and asking Muslims to kill al-mushrikeen as in ayat al-sayf and fighting ahl al-kitab as in ayat al-jizya and we kuffar would stop going after islam Deal?

>and is an impingement upon religious expression.

What religious expression? darling if you live in Rome then you do what the Romans do and if you want to cover your face then go back to where you came from get it?

>You are arguing for CENSORSHIP

What cesnsorship?

> and that's one of the worst crimes you could commit against liberalism. Leave the woman her niqab and take a lesson or two in humanity. ...

Humanity! I see. How much do you know about humanity? Let me guess: nothing right?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".