Thanks for your ad hominem attacks

Submitted by zzazzeefrazzee@gmail.com (United States), Feb 16, 2008 at 23:43

Shukran jazeelan li jabatkum, lakin ma haslatu nuqta min jawabi, wa thuma ma qultu shay'an muhim fi ghibbatak. Hal anta majnun khalis am la? Yumkin anta jahl mukhallaf bi ghayr aql sakin.

Your reply makes no sense. My last reply quoted Brittanica. Apparently you choose to overlook that. Or did you find something you disagree with? Of so, what was it?

Then again, you only seem to be fond of hurling insults- what are called ad hominem fallacies- not composing a valid argument of your own like even a half-way respectable individual usually manage to do.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".