For Sohail and the origins of Islam and the fate of communism!

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Nov 24, 2006 at 08:32

My dear sohail like I said before Islam is the ultimate form of colonialism.

Muslims are told by their Allah to invade , plunder, rape, capture slaves, and collect booty (the funny thing is that the loot belongs to Allah and his rasul Q8:1. And then Malik tells us that 1/5 of the loot goes to the Sultan or Khalifa. If this is not criminal, I do not know what it is) and then your Allah demands that the poor infidels pay the mafia tax called Jizya. Your Allah declares unconditional war on dar al-harb until Islam becomes the supreme religion Q9:29. So much for the religion of peace, but this is the barbaric Islamic law. The sad thing is that all this barbarity is done in the name of your Allah. This is the same Islamic law that brutalized your ancestors and then you come to this blog and defend it? Shame on you.

And while we are at it: the theologies of both Hindusim and Buddhism (your ancestors that is) are miles ahead from the retarded Muslim theology. Why is that my dear Sohail?

So there are 1.2 billion Muslims, so what? There were 1.6 billion communists at one time and where is communism now? And yes communism is also, by definition, a religion and fascism combined in one not unlike Islam.

Did you ever ask yourself why is the God of Islam so pre-occupied with polemics? Why would your Allah be so pre-occupied about such mundane things as the Trinity (Muhammad the poor theologian did not get the correct Trinity) or praying to idols and why does your Allah regard shirk (oh I forgot you do not know Arabic: polythiesm) as the ultimate sin but not killing 3000 innocent victims in the 9/11 atrocity?And why does he demand that you pray 5 times per day? Why is so insecure? And why would your allah asks you do go out and spread islam by force if needed, your Allah can do that at the blink of an eye but it seems that he cannot do it! He also tells you to go out and fight in his cause whatever that is. It seems that your Allah cannot do his dirty work and therefore he is not omnipotent as he claims, and therefore he is no god.

I would bet you a buck that if you take polemics out of the Qur'an you would be left with nothing! And you know what? A god that is pre-occupied with polemics which is very much a silly human activity cannot be a God!

Did you ever ask yourself why do so many people have no like for Islam but the same people are very undersranding and curious about let us say Buddhism and Hinduism?

And it is clear to me that you are either in denial or you did not get the point after our little chat about Jesus in the Qur'an that Muahmmad was a poor theologian who plagiarized the literary works of the great civilizations of the Middle East in the late antique period and the Qur'an is nothing but poor literature. The funny thing is that Muhammad was saying that Jesus is a prophet/Rabbi (plagiarized from The Gospel of Thomas) and Jesus is God (plagiarized again for the Gospel of Thomas). So much for the Qur'an the word of Allah and his rasul.

You? I feel sorry for you. You live in a little fantasy world and you respond with different screen names (remember: thetruth?) Why do you do that? You are also defending Arabian imperialism! And you do not know any Arabic and you are not even an Arab. Shame

As for Jews fleeing Spain for Turkey so what? The Jews left a big time hell to a better hell and that is Turkey. Jews were treated as second class citizens and still had to pay the Jizya tax.

Are you also aware that thousands of Armenians that fled the Armenian genocide ended in Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Palestine and Iraq? Armenians fleeing for their lives did not expect to be treated as equal citizens they only wanted to live even in a Muslim country. So your point is bogus

Here is your home work for today:

1. I'm sure you agree that the gold standard for the Qur'an is the 1923-1924 Cairo edition of the Qur'an. Now, I will give you a buck if you can provide me with similar copy of the Qur'an that is extant from the time of the so called 3Uthmanic recension in the 650's CE. And good luck.

2. I will give you a buck if you can find any Muslim papyri or epigraphy or even texts that have the name of Muhammad that dates before 692 CE or 72 years after his death. And why is the name of Muhammad absent from the extant Muslim sources for 72 years after his death?...

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".