|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Rohinngyas openly display rule 2 that I described in the above messageReader comment on item: Spelling Out Israel Victory Submitted by Prashant (United States), Aug 25, 2022 at 12:58 Dear Dr Pipes, In the above message I outlined 13 rules that Muslims follow in their "wars" of separation to create Muslim-only regions inside non-Muslim regions of the world. The second of these 13 rules stated, "If the Islamic majority region shares a border with a neighboring Muslim country, do not try to merge with that country. Devise a new ethnicity and demand a new nation." Today BBC presented a report on the 5th anniversary of the Rohingya Muslim (self-created) crisis. This report provided an instance where Rohingya Muslims are following my second rule in Myanmar and Bangladesh. Bangladesh is 90% Muslim. Myanmar is mainly Buddhist. Per the above rule Muslims will make no effort to assimilate in Bangladesh and will insist on a separate Muslim nation in Myanmar. BBC report stated that in the Rohingya refugee schools in Bangladesh, the refugees are following the Myanmarian curriculum for education. They are proudly not teaching the local Bangla language to the kids. The report also stated that Bangladesh is also not making any effort to assimilate these refugees into her society. One of the Rohingya Muslims who was quoted in the report displayed the Islamic hypocrisy when he said, "Bangladesh is not our country, Myanmar is our country.". He forgot to mention that the Rohingyas are running a separatist movement to separate from Myanmar for over 100 years. For the purpose of separation Myanmar was not their country! The whole goal of these people, like that of their Kashmiri and Palestinian brothers, is to grab land and carve out a new Muslim-only region out of Myanmar. We have to have a sharp eye to figure out how Muslims operate vs how other people operate. I cite the examples of Sindhi Hindus who were forced to leave Sindh at the time of India's partition in 1947. If Sindhi Hindus had followed the example of Rohingyas, they would have denied any link with Indian Hindus and India, would have hypocritically claimed that "Pakistan was their nation", and would have carved out a separate Hindu-only enclave in Pakistan. In the same context, while the Rohingya refugees in Muslim Bangladesh are refusing to assimilate in the Bangladeshi society, the same refugees who manage to find their way into Hindu majority India, show no desire to go back. They are living in their shanty towns in New Delhi and are waiting for the government housing. Peace, progress and prosperity is not one of the priorities of Muslims. Islamization of the planet is. The world must insist on treating Muslims and Islam with the exact same standard with which other people and religions are treated. There is no need of any Muslim nation in the world. The nations that do not follow democratic principles are inferior and such nations must not be allowed to exist or created. When the news media reports on Kashmir, Palestine and the Rohingyas, they must mention that Muslims systematically refuse to assimilate with others for centuries. If the media does not do so, people should. I just did. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Reader comments (112) on this item |
Latest Articles |
|||||||||||
All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes (The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998. For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.) |