Indo-US Alliance Seem to be a Positive Force for the World

Submitted by Singha (India), Jun 27, 2008 at 00:54

Blacks should indeed be educated on the role of muslims in slave trade.

That apart the alliance between India and United States would have happened long back but for the abysmal leadership in both the democracies.

Sequence of blunders:

Truman made the faustian bargain with saudis for oil providing funding for islamism.

nehru, third rate Indian leader with communist symptathies was foolish and failed to see the benefits of alliance with the US. Truman certainly a equally foolish. Goaded by Winston Churchill who should have known better Truman allied with muslim pakistan. Churchill's imperialist glasses perhaps clouded rational thinking.

Wily nixon and henry kissinger were worse. Midwifed by pakistan, they enabled the rise of another evil power - totalitarian china.

(there is a thinking that china was afraid that after the fall of Soviets, jehad will be directed towards them. While being friendly with muslim totalitarians in arabia and pakistan, china has been brutal towards muslims in its borders; muslim brothers of course hate china for what it has done to islam in china; and Jehad in eastern turkistan is china's achilles' heel. China which closely collaborated with pakistan and arabs during the Afghan jehad directed those forces to take on America)

Convoluted thinking still continues. Idiots like Kevin (duddy) rudd are bottle necks in creating a consortinum of democracies that believe in free values to take on totalitarian evil (both islamist/chinese communist). To the eternal shame of the State Department genuine Indian nationalist leaders like Narendrabhai Modi, friend of Jews and someone willing to take on islamic fascism were denied the US visa.

Forces of History are strong. Despite all out efforts by china and pakistan there is a trend towards genuine entente between US and India. The jews in Israel and United States can and should play a catalysing role in sustenance of this alliance.

Passivity and narrowness in defining enemy (defining just islamic arab imperialism rather than the whole of islam as the enemy) will be harmful in the long run.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".